Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 4, 2026

05:14
Comparison of Agreement and Accuracy using Binocular Wavefront Optometer with Autorefractor and Phoropter
Published on: September 16, 2025
518
Corneal Ectasia Risk And Percentage Tissue Altered In Myopic Patients Presenting For Refractive Surgery
Hon Shing Ong1,2,3, Mohamed Farook1, Benjamin Boon Chuan Tan1
1Department of Corneal and External Diseases, Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore, Singapore.
Clinical Ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)
|November 6, 2019
Summary
Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE) and Laser-Assisted Sub-Epithelial Keratectomy (LASEK) modify the Percentage Tissue Altered (PTA) threshold for safe refractive surgery. Further research is needed to establish new safety guidelines for these procedures to prevent post-operative ectasia.
Area of Science:
- Ophthalmology
- Corneal Surgery
- Refractive Surgery
Background:
- A Percentage Tissue Altered (PTA) score of ≥40% is a known risk factor for post-operative ectasia after Laser-Assisted In-Situ Keratomileusis (LASIK).
- The safety thresholds for newer refractive procedures like Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE) and Laser-Assisted Sub-Epithelial Keratectomy (LASEK) regarding PTA are not well-defined.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate whether refractive procedures such as LASEK and SMILE alter the acceptable Percentage Tissue Altered (PTA) range for safe corneal refractive surgery.
- To evaluate the potential risk of corneal ectasia in patients undergoing LASEK or SMILE based on estimated PTA scores.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective observational study reviewed 114 eyes (66 patients) that underwent LASEK or SMILE.
- Percentage Tissue Altered (PTA) was calculated for each patient as if they had undergone LASIK.
- The Randleman Ectasia Risk Score System (ERSS) was used to assess pre-operative ectasia risk.
Main Results:
- A significant proportion of eyes undergoing SMILE (up to 31.9%) and LASEK (up to 60.0%) had calculated PTA scores ≥40%.
- Maximum calculated PTA reached up to 47.9% in the SMILE group and 51.5% in the LASEK group.
- While 12.8-80.0% of eyes were at moderate-to-high risk based on ERSS, no post-surgical ectasia was observed within 3 years.
Conclusions:
- SMILE and LASEK procedures appear to modify the PTA range within which refractive surgery can be safely performed.
- New, procedure-specific PTA thresholds must be established for LASEK and SMILE to ensure patient safety and prevent post-operative ectasia.
- Clinical practice recommendations require further determination of safe PTA limits for these alternative refractive surgeries.

