New Antiandrogen Compounds Compared to Docetaxel for Metastatic Hormone Sensitive Prostate Cancer: Results from a

Michele Marchioni1,2,3,4, Marta Di Nicola1,2, Giulia Primiceri1,3,4

  • 1Department of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences, G. d'Annunzio University of Chieti, Chieti, Italy.

The Journal of Urology
|November 6, 2019
PubMed
Abstract

Insights

New androgen receptor axis targeted therapies show promise for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer, reducing disease progression and improving safety compared to docetaxel, though overall survival benefits are not yet statistically significant.

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Urology
  • Clinical Trials

Background:

  • Docetaxel is the current standard of care for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer.
  • Androgen receptor axis targeted therapies have emerged as effective treatment options.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To systematically review randomized controlled trials comparing first-line treatments for hormone-sensitive prostate cancer.
  • To analyze overall survival, progression-free survival, and high-grade adverse events.

Main Methods:

  • Systematic literature review adhering to PRISMA criteria.
  • PICO methodology used for outcome assessment (Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcomes).
  • Key outcomes: overall survival, progression-free survival, and high-grade adverse events.

Main Results:

  • No treatment demonstrated statistically significant superiority over docetaxel in overall survival.
  • Abiraterone, enzalutamide, and apalutamide showed statistically significant lower disease progression rates compared to docetaxel.
  • Enzalutamide and apalutamide exhibited significantly lower rates of high-grade adverse events than docetaxel.

Conclusions:

  • Androgen receptor axis targeted therapies combined with androgen deprivation therapy do not offer a statistically significant overall survival advantage over docetaxel.
  • These novel therapies are associated with reduced disease progression.
  • Apalutamide and enzalutamide present a more favorable safety profile.