Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 4, 2026

An Open Source Technology Platform to Manufacture Hydrogel-Based 3D Culture Models in an Automated and Standardized Fashion
Published on: March 31, 2022
Publishers' Responsibilities in Promoting Data Quality and Reproducibility
1Public Library of Science (PLOS), Cambridge, UK. ihrynaszkiewicz@plos.org.
Scholarly publishers can enhance research integrity by promoting transparency and open science practices. Implementing consistent policies and improving infrastructure are key to increasing data quality and reproducibility.
Area of Science:
- Scholarly Publishing
- Open Science
- Research Integrity
Background:
- Scholarly publishers play a crucial role in the research ecosystem.
- Increasing demands for data quality and reproducible research necessitate changes in publishing practices.
- Current publishing models face challenges in promoting transparency and openness.
Purpose of the Study:
- To outline six key areas where scholarly publishers can foster transparency and openness.
- To describe practical approaches publishers are employing to improve research quality.
- To assess the progress, effectiveness, and implications of these publisher-led initiatives.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of publisher initiatives across six defined areas.
- Review of current practices in promoting data sharing, code availability, and open materials.
- Examination of strategies for enhancing peer review and combating misconduct.
- Evaluation of infrastructure improvements, including study registration and data repositories.
- Assessment of incentive structures for open research practices.
- Consideration of open access models and data/metadata sharing.
Main Results:
- Publishers are actively implementing strategies in all six identified areas.
- Progress varies across different initiatives, with some showing significant advancements.
- Key areas of focus include policy development, infrastructure enhancement, and incentive creation.
- Collaboration with researchers, industry, and communities is crucial for success.
- The effectiveness of these measures is being continuously evaluated.
Conclusions:
- Scholarly publishers are vital in driving the adoption of open science principles.
- Continued publisher commitment to transparency is essential for improving data quality and reproducibility.
- The outlined strategies offer a roadmap for advancing research integrity in scholarly communication.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Protein Folding Quality Check in the RER
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision
Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
Hardy-Weinberg Principle
Replication in Eukaryotes
Replication in Eukaryotes
Many Proteins Orchestrate Replication at the Origin
Eukaryotic replication follows many of the same...

