Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 4, 2026

Author Spotlight: Addressing Regulatory Gaps in Molecular Studies by Quantifying Viral Vectors in Complex Matrices
Published on: July 14, 2023
Partial analytical validation of the VetScan cPL rapid test
Joerg M Steiner1, Phillip Guadiano1, Robynne R Gomez1
1Gastrointestinal Laboratory, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, USA.
The VetScan cPL rapid test for canine pancreatitis showed poor analytical validation. It did not meet manufacturer specifications for accuracy or precision in this study.
Area of Science:
- Veterinary Diagnostics
- Clinical Pathology
- Canine Medicine
Background:
- Serum canine pancreatic lipase immunoreactivity (cPLI) is the standard for diagnosing canine pancreatitis.
- A new point-of-care assay, VetScan cPL, is available, but lacks validation data.
Purpose of the Study:
- To conduct a partial analytical validation of the VetScan cPL rapid test.
- Evaluate the performance of the VetScan cPL against established diagnostic standards.
Main Methods:
- Utilized leftover serum samples from a diagnostic laboratory.
- Assessed adherence to manufacturer guidelines, linearity, repeatability, and reproducibility.
- Correlated VetScan cPL results with Spec cPL assay results.
Main Results:
- Dilutional parallelism ranged from 77.4% to 162.9% (mean 119.3%).
- Intra-assay and inter-assay variability ranged from 16.9% to 36.7% (mean 25.1%) and 14.1% to 51.2% (mean 31.8%), respectively.
- Only 39% of measurements met manufacturer specifications; correlation with Spec cPL was r=.758.
Conclusions:
- The VetScan cPL demonstrated suboptimal linearity and imprecision.
- The test failed to meet manufacturer specifications for most measurements.
- The VetScan cPL did not pass basic analytical validation in this study.
More Related Videos
07:40Field Postmortem Rabies Rapid Immunochromatographic Diagnostic Test for Resource-Limited Settings with Further Molecular Applications
Published on: June 29, 2020
09:57Development and Validation of a Quantitative PCR Method for Equid Herpesvirus-2 Diagnostics in Respiratory Fluids
Published on: March 17, 2016