Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 4, 2026

05:54
Eye-tracking to Distinguish Comprehension-based and Oculomotor-based Regressive Eye Movements During Reading
Published on: October 18, 2018
6.6K
Can Self-reported Ocular Motor and Perceptive Alterations Predict a Reading Disability? A Pilot Study on the Analytic
1Ophthalmology / Neuro-Ophthalmology, University of Turin, Turin, ITA.
Cureus
|November 8, 2019
Summary
The AAP2 questionnaire helps identify children at risk for developmental dyslexia early. This tool assesses perceptual and visuomotor functions, offering a cost-effective screening method for reading disabilities.
Area of Science:
- Neurodevelopmental Disorders
- Developmental Psychology
- Educational Psychology
Background:
- Early diagnosis of neurodevelopmental disorders, particularly reading disability (developmental dyslexia), is crucial.
- Self-report questionnaires are emerging as reliable, low-cost, and time-efficient screening tools.
- Perceptual and visuomotor functions are implicated in the pathogenesis of developmental dyslexia.
Purpose of the Study:
- To present a modified version of the Analytic Anamnestic Protocol (AAP2) specifically targeting developmental dyslexics.
- To evaluate the preliminary results of the AAP2 in a group of school-age children with reading disabilities.
- To assess the AAP2's effectiveness in identifying early risk factors for developmental dyslexia.
Main Methods:
- The AAP2 comprises 25 questions across four sections: family, general, past, and recent specialist medical history.
- An additional seven questions focus on lexical difficulties related to developmental dyslexia (DD section).
- The AAP2 was administered to 37 typically developing children and 34 children with diagnosed dyslexia.
Main Results:
- Dyslexic children exhibited significantly higher visuomotor and sensory scores compared to controls, particularly in the recent specialist medical history and DD sections.
- The visuosensory domain was more affected than the visuomotor function in the dyslexic group.
- The AAP2 demonstrated high sensibility (94.12%) and specificity (77.78%) for the recent specialist medical history section, and 100% sensibility and 80% specificity for the DD section.
Conclusions:
- The AAP2 shows promise as an effective tool for screening children at risk for developmental dyslexia in early primary school.
- The questionnaire aids in identifying potential risk factors through self-reported perceptual and visuomotor history.
- Further refinement of the scoring criteria may enhance the AAP2's diagnostic accuracy.
Keywords:
analytic anamnestic protocol (aap)dyslexiaperceptionpolyunsaturated fatty acids (pufa)reading disabilityreceiver operating characteristic (roc) curveself-reportsensibilityspecificityvisuomotor
