Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 4, 2026

Measuring Attentional Biases for Threat in Children and Adults
Published on: October 19, 2014
Anger as a trigger for information search in integrative negotiations
Laura Rees1, Shu-Cheng Steve Chi2, Ray Friedman3
1Bloch School of Management, University of Missouri-Kansas City.
Abstract:
Research has shown that anger can be both detrimental in negotiations (increasing the chance of impasse or conflict) and helpful to the angry person (by eliciting concessions from the other party). Much of this work has focused on a receiver's emotional response to anger. Yet little work has examined the influence of anger on information search, an important cognitive mechanism for joint value creation in integrative negotiations. We propose a cognitive approach: that negotiators facing an angry partner are more likely to seek out diagnostic information about their partner's preferences and priorities. In turn, this information should enable negotiators to reach higher joint gains. Across multiple studies, we find that negotiators facing an angry versus a happy counterpart seek out more information, which leads to increased value creation. We discuss the theoretical and practical implications of these findings. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Aggression
The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic
Reason and Intuition
Agonism and Antagonism: Quantification
To quantify these effects, researchers use a dose-response curve, which provides valuable information about the potency and efficacy of a drug. Potency refers to...
Routes of Persuasion
Frustration and Conflict: Approach-Approach, Approach-Avoidance
One common type of conflict is the Approach–Approach Conflict. In this case, a person faces two desirable...

