Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 4, 2026

Comparison of Agreement and Accuracy using Binocular Wavefront Optometer with Autorefractor and Phoropter
Published on: September 16, 2025
Retrospective comparative analysis of intraocular lens calculation formulas after hyperopic refractive surgery
Anibal Francone1,2, Nicole Lemanski2, Martin Charles1
1Centro Oftalmológico Dr. Charles Sociedad Anónima, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Purpose:
To compare the intraocular lens calculation formulas and evaluate postoperative refractive results of patients with previous hyperopic corneal refractive surgery.
Design:
Retrospective, comparative, observational study.
Setting:
Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Methods:
Clinical charts and optical biometric data of 39 eyes from 24 consecutive patients diagnosed with previous hyperopic laser vision correction and cataract surgery were reviewed and analyzed. The Intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation using the Holladay 2 formula (Lenstar) and the American Society of Cataract and Refractive Surgery (ASCRS) Post-Refractive IOL Calculator (version 4.9, 2017) were compared to the actual manifest refractive spherical equivalent (MRSE) following cataract surgery. No pre-Lasik / PRK or post-Lasik / PRK information was used in any of the calculations. The IOL prediction error, the mean IOL prediction error, the median absolute refractive prediction error, and the percentages of eyes within ±0.50 diopter (D) and ±1.00 D of the predicted refraction were calculated.
Results:
The Holladay 2 formula produced a mean arithmetic IOL prediction error significantly different from zero (P = 0.003). Surprisingly, the mean arithmetic IOL prediction errors generated by Shammas, Haigis-L and Barret True K No History formulas were not significantly different from zero (P = 0.14, P = 0.49, P = 0.81, respectively).There were no significant differences in the median absolute refractive prediction error or percentage of eyes within ± 0.50 D or ± 1.00 D of the predicted refraction between formulas or methods.
Conclusion:
In eyes with previous hyperopic LASIK/PRK and no prior data, there were no significant differences in the accuracy of IOL power calculation between the Holladay 2 formula and the ASCRS Post-refractive IOL calculator.
More Related Videos
05:46Author Spotlight: Advancements in Refractive Surgical Correction for Presbyopia and Exploring Postoperative Visual Acuity
Published on: September 20, 2024
04:59Author Spotlight: Enhancing Visual Outcomes in Cataract Surgery: A Novel Technique to Prevent Posterior Capsular Opacification Through IOL Rotation
Published on: July 7, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Focusing of Light in the Eye
Glaucoma: Overview
Open Angle Glaucoma: Treatment
Drugs such as carbonic anhydrase inhibitors, α2- and...
Angle Closure Glaucoma: Treatment