Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Personal Choice and Fate Attributions01:19

Personal Choice and Fate Attributions

142
Some individuals interpret life events as a consequence of their personal choices and actions, while others believe that outcomes are dictated by fate or destiny. This divergence in perspective has been examined in psychological and cross-cultural studies, particularly in relation to religious faith and cultural beliefs about causality.Fate and Personal ResponsibilityPeople who emphasize personal responsibility view events as direct consequences of their decisions. For instance, breaking a leg...
142
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - I01:30

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - I

967
The Bradford Hill criteria are a group of principles that provide a framework to determine a causal relationship between a specific factor and a disease. There are nine criteria that are pivotal in assessing causality in epidemiological studies. Here's a closer look at Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality criteria with definitions and examples:
967
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II01:28

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II

1.1K
The Bradford Hill criteria serve as guidelines for establishing causative links in epidemiological research. Beyond Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality, key criteria also include Biological Gradient, Plausibility, Coherence, Experiment, and Analogy. These principles assist scientists in assessing the likelihood of causation in complex biological contexts. Below is a summary of these concepts:
1.1K
Causes of Social Behavior II: Cognitive Processes01:15

Causes of Social Behavior II: Cognitive Processes

168
Cognitive processes affect social behavior by guiding how individuals perceive, interpret, and respond to social stimuli. These mental processes enable individuals to assess others' behaviors, attribute causes to their actions, and form expectations based on past experiences.Causes of Behavior and Social JudgmentsIndividuals determine the causes of others' behaviors by distinguishing between personal traits and external circumstances. For example, if a friend frequently arrives late, an...
168
Cause and Effect01:53

Cause and Effect

12.0K
While variables are sometimes correlated because one does cause the other, it could also be that some other factor, a confounding variable, is actually causing the systematic movement in our variables of interest. For instance, as sales in ice cream increase, so does the overall rate of crime. Is it possible that indulging in your favorite flavor of ice cream could send you on a crime spree? Or, after committing crime do you think you might decide to treat yourself to a cone?
12.0K
Framing Effects03:26

Framing Effects

7.8K
Information is everywhere and its presentation—such as how and when items are presented—can impact our perceptions and decisions surrounding the info. This broad concept umbrellas framing effects—influences that occur due to the way information is framed in its appearance, whether it’s purely the order or the specific wording of a message. Let’s take a look at numerous ways in which two versions of something can objectively say the same thing, yet we respond in...
7.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Scintillation light detection in the 6-m drift-length ProtoDUNE Dual Phase liquid argon TPC.

The European physical journal. C, Particles and fields·2022
Same author

Prospects for beyond the Standard Model physics searches at the Deep Underground Neutrino Experiment: DUNE Collaboration.

The European physical journal. C, Particles and fields·2021
Same author

Studying the sense of agency in the absence of motor movement: an investigation into temporal binding of tactile sensations and auditory effects.

Experimental brain research·2021
Same author

Intentional action and limitation of personal autonomy. Do restrictions of action selection decrease the sense of agency?

Consciousness and cognition·2021
Same author

Impaired self-agency inferences in schizophrenia: The role of cognitive capacity and causal reasoning style.

European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists·2017
Same author

Alcohol representations are socially situated: An investigation of beverage representations by using a property generation task.

Appetite·2017

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 4, 2026

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

1.1K

Intentionality and temporal binding: Do causality beliefs increase the perceived temporal attraction between events?

S Antusch1, R Custers1, H Marien1

  • 1Department of Psychology, Utrecht University, the Netherlands.

Consciousness and Cognition
|November 10, 2019
PubMed
Summary

This study found that auditory stimuli appear to repel each other in time, contrary to the intentional binding effect. Causal beliefs weakly reduced this repulsion, suggesting motor action is not essential for temporal binding.

Keywords:
Intentional actionPerceived causalityTemporal bindingTemporal repulsion

More Related Videos

Irrelevant Stimuli and Action Control: Analyzing the Influence of Ignored Stimuli via the Distractor-Response Binding Paradigm
12:12

Irrelevant Stimuli and Action Control: Analyzing the Influence of Ignored Stimuli via the Distractor-Response Binding Paradigm

Published on: May 14, 2014

11.0K
Testing Sensory and Multisensory Function in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder
09:13

Testing Sensory and Multisensory Function in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder

Published on: April 22, 2015

17.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 4, 2026

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

1.1K
Irrelevant Stimuli and Action Control: Analyzing the Influence of Ignored Stimuli via the Distractor-Response Binding Paradigm
12:12

Irrelevant Stimuli and Action Control: Analyzing the Influence of Ignored Stimuli via the Distractor-Response Binding Paradigm

Published on: May 14, 2014

11.0K
Testing Sensory and Multisensory Function in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder
09:13

Testing Sensory and Multisensory Function in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder

Published on: April 22, 2015

17.0K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Psychology of Perception

Background:

  • The intentional binding effect links motor actions with their perceived effects in time.
  • Existing theories often emphasize motor control in explaining temporal binding.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate alternative mechanisms for temporal binding, excluding motor action.
  • To examine temporal perception of auditory stimuli and the influence of causal beliefs.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a sensory-based Libet clock paradigm with two distinct auditory stimuli.
  • Manipulated beliefs about the causal relationship between the auditory stimuli across two experiments.

Main Results:

  • Observed a robust temporal repulsion effect, where stimuli were perceived as further apart in time.
  • Found that causal beliefs attenuated repulsion, but this effect was fragile.
  • Temporal repulsion remained unaffected by the intensity of prior learning.

Conclusions:

  • Challenges the necessity of motor action for temporal binding phenomena.
  • Suggests sensory and belief-based mechanisms play a role in temporal perception.
  • Provides insights into intentional action awareness and multisensory integration.