Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 4, 2026

10:23
Screening for Melanoma Modifiers using a Zebrafish Autochthonous Tumor Model
Published on: November 13, 2012
14.1K
Screening for Melanoma in Men: a Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.
Adewole S Adamson1,2, Jamie A Jarmul3,4, Michael P Pignone5,6
1Department of Internal Medicine, Dell Medical School, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA. adewole.adamson@austin.utexas.edu.
Journal of General Internal Medicine
|November 10, 2019
Summary
Systematic skin screening every two years for white men aged 50-75 may be cost-effective, potentially reducing melanoma mortality by up to 30%. Further studies on screening accuracy are needed.
Area of Science:
- Dermatology and Public Health
- Health Economics and Outcomes Research
Background:
- Systematic skin screening is proposed to decrease melanoma mortality.
- High-risk populations warrant assessment for screening effectiveness.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of systematic skin screening in a high-risk demographic for melanoma mortality.
- To compare systematic screening against usual care (incidental detection).
Main Methods:
- A cohort Markov state-transition model was developed.
- The model compared systematic screening with usual care in a hypothetical cohort of 10,000 white men aged 50-75.
- Sensitivity and specificity of screening and usual care were evaluated, alongside cost-effectiveness measured in cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY).
Main Results:
- Screening every 2 years starting at age 60 reduced melanoma mortality by 20% with a cost-utility of $26,503 per QALY.
- Screening every 2 years starting at age 50 reduced mortality by 30% with an incremental cost-utility of $67,970 per QALY.
- Results were sensitive to screening accuracy differences and screening costs, but not biopsy or treatment costs.
Conclusions:
- Systematic skin screening every 2 years, starting at age 50 or 60, may be cost-effective for white men.
- The cost-effectiveness is sensitive to the difference in sensitivity between systematic screening and usual care.
- Further research on the accuracy of systematic screening exams compared to usual care is necessary to justify a screening trial.
Related Concept Videos
Skin Cancer
5.6K
Skin cancer is a type of cancer that occurs when there is an abnormal growth of skin cells, usually triggered by damage to the DNA within the skin cells. It is primarily caused by exposure to ultraviolet (UV) radiation from the sun or artificial sources like tanning beds. Skin cancer is the most common type of cancer worldwide, and its incidence continues to rise.
Basal Cell Carcinoma (BCC): BCC is the most common type of skin cancer, accounting for about 80% of cases. It typically develops in...
Basal Cell Carcinoma (BCC): BCC is the most common type of skin cancer, accounting for about 80% of cases. It typically develops in...
5.6K
Cancer Survival Analysis
617
Cancer survival analysis focuses on quantifying and interpreting the time from a key starting point, such as diagnosis or the initiation of treatment, to a specific endpoint, such as remission or death. This analysis provides critical insights into treatment effectiveness and factors that influence patient outcomes, helping to shape clinical decisions and guide prognostic evaluations. A cornerstone of oncology research, survival analysis tackles the challenges of skewed, non-normally...
617

