Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Distribution and Dispersion00:54

Distribution and Dispersion

24.0K
To understand intra-specific interactions in populations, scientists measure the spatial arrangement of species individuals. This geographic arrangement is known as the species distribution or dispersion. Highly territorial species exhibit a uniform distribution pattern, in which individuals are spaced at relatively equal distances from one another. Species that are highly tied to particular resources, such as food or shelter, tend to concentrate around those resources, and thus exhibit a...
24.0K
F Distribution01:19

F Distribution

8.7K
The F distribution was named after Sir Ronald Fisher, an English statistician. The F statistic is a ratio (a fraction) with two sets of degrees of freedom; one for the numerator and one for the denominator. The F distribution is derived from the Student's t distribution. The values of the F distribution are squares of the corresponding values of the t distribution. One-Way ANOVA expands the t test for comparing more than two groups. The scope of that derivation is beyond the level of this...
8.7K
One-Way ANOVA01:18

One-Way ANOVA

11.7K
One-way ANOVA analyzes more than three samples categorized by one factor. For example, it can compare the average mileage of sports bikes. Here, the data is categorized by one factor - the company. However, one-way ANOVA cannot be used to simultaneously compare the sample mean of three or more samples categorized by two factors. An example of two factors would be sports bikes from different companies driven in different terrains, such as a desert or snowy landscape. Here, two-way ANOVA is used...
11.7K
Wald-Wolfowitz Runs Test II01:17

Wald-Wolfowitz Runs Test II

498
The Wald-Wolfowitz runs test, commonly referred to as the runs test, is a nonparametric test used to assess the randomness of ordered data. The test evaluates the number of runs, which are consecutive sequences of similar elements within the data. If the number of runs is significantly higher or lower than expected, the data is considered non-random, indicating a detectable pattern or structure.
For binary data, runs are identified using symbols such as + and −, or equivalently, 1s and 0s. In...
498
Frequency-dependent Selection01:21

Frequency-dependent Selection

23.0K
When the fitness of a trait is influenced by how common it is (i.e., its frequency) relative to different traits within a population, this is referred to as frequency-dependent selection. Frequency-dependent selection may occur between species or within a single species. This type of selection can either be positive—with more common phenotypes having higher fitness—or negative, with rarer phenotypes conferring increased fitness.
23.0K
Speciation Rates01:07

Speciation Rates

22.5K
Overview
22.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A transfer RNA inosine modification drives genome-wide synonymous recoding across human commensal bacterial families.

PNAS nexus·2026
Same author

Geometry of the space of phylogenetic trees with non-identical leaves.

Advances in applied mathematics·2026
Same author

Distances Between Extension Spaces of Phylogenetic Trees.

IEEE transactions on computational biology and bioinformatics·2025
Same author

Guidelines for preventing and reporting contamination in low-biomass microbiome studies.

Nature microbiology·2025
Same author

Microbes with higher metabolic independence are enriched in human gut microbiomes under stress.

eLife·2025
Same author

Early-life and concurrent predictors of the healthy adolescent microbiome in a cohort study.

Genome medicine·2025
Same journal

Large-scale comparative genomics and structure-function analysis enables characterization of known and novel genetic determinants of antimicrobial resistance in bacterial pathogens.

Frontiers in microbiology·2026
Same journal

Biliary tract microbes and common bile duct stones: current status and prospects.

Frontiers in microbiology·2026
Same journal

Editorial: A molecular and structural approach to deciphering and combating infectious pathogens.

Frontiers in microbiology·2026
Same journal

Protein-directed nucleotide selection in the DRT3 defense system: mechanism, biological context, and constraints on programmability.

Frontiers in microbiology·2026
Same journal

Abietic acid targets RAN to restrict coxsackievirus B3 infection.

Frontiers in microbiology·2026
Same journal

Endosymbiotic interactions in the fungal kingdom: a framework for progressive endosymbiosis.

Frontiers in microbiology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 4, 2026

Development of New Methods for Quantifying Fish Density Using Underwater Stereo-video Tools
09:32

Development of New Methods for Quantifying Fish Density Using Underwater Stereo-video Tools

Published on: November 20, 2017

9.7K

Rarefaction, Alpha Diversity, and Statistics.

Amy D Willis1

  • 1Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States.

Frontiers in Microbiology
|November 12, 2019
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Ecological diversity estimates are biased by sampling intensity. This study proposes statistical methods, including latent variable models and bias corrections, to accurately assess microbial diversity and compare ecosystems.

Keywords:
bioinformaticscomputational biologyecological data analysislatent variable modelmeasurement errorreproducibility

More Related Videos

Microbiota Analysis Using Two-step PCR and Next-generation 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing
11:22

Microbiota Analysis Using Two-step PCR and Next-generation 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing

Published on: October 15, 2019

31.0K
Isolation and Analysis of Microbial Communities in Soil, Rhizosphere, and Roots in Perennial Grass Experiments
10:31

Isolation and Analysis of Microbial Communities in Soil, Rhizosphere, and Roots in Perennial Grass Experiments

Published on: July 24, 2018

56.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 4, 2026

Development of New Methods for Quantifying Fish Density Using Underwater Stereo-video Tools
09:32

Development of New Methods for Quantifying Fish Density Using Underwater Stereo-video Tools

Published on: November 20, 2017

9.7K
Microbiota Analysis Using Two-step PCR and Next-generation 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing
11:22

Microbiota Analysis Using Two-step PCR and Next-generation 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing

Published on: October 15, 2019

31.0K
Isolation and Analysis of Microbial Communities in Soil, Rhizosphere, and Roots in Perennial Grass Experiments
10:31

Isolation and Analysis of Microbial Communities in Soil, Rhizosphere, and Roots in Perennial Grass Experiments

Published on: July 24, 2018

56.7K

Area of Science:

  • Ecology
  • Statistics
  • Microbiology

Background:

  • Understanding ecological diversity drivers is crucial for ecosystem health.
  • Current methods for diversity assessment are often influenced by sampling intensity.
  • A statistical perspective is needed to address bias and variance in diversity estimates.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide a statistical framework for understanding ecological diversity.
  • To address the bias and variance associated with diversity estimation methods.
  • To improve the accuracy of microbial diversity analysis and inter-ecosystem comparisons.

Main Methods:

  • Framing ecological diversity as an unknown statistical parameter.
  • Analyzing bias and variance in plug-in and rarefied diversity estimates.
  • Applying latent variable models and bias correction techniques.

Main Results:

  • Statistical methods can mitigate issues related to variance in diversity estimates.
  • Bias corrections are essential for accurate diversity assessment.
  • Latent variable models offer a promising approach for analyzing microbial diversity.

Conclusions:

  • Ecologists should utilize diversity estimates that account for unobserved species.
  • Measurement error models are recommended for robust comparisons of diversity across ecosystems.
  • A statistical approach enhances the reliability of ecological diversity studies.