Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 4, 2026

Composition and Distribution Analysis of Bioaerosols Under Different Environmental Conditions
Published on: January 7, 2019
A systematic approach for the comparison of PM10, PM2.5, and PM1 mass concentrations of characteristic environmental
Antonio Speranza1, Rosa Caggiano2, Vito Summa2
1IMAA, Istituto di Metodologie per l'Analisi Ambientale, CNR, C.da S. Loja - Zona Industriale, 85050, Tito Scalo, PZ, Italy. antonio.speranza@imaa.cnr.it.
Abstract:
This study explores the use of a systematic approach in the comparison of simultaneous measurements of PM10, PM2.5, and PM1 mass concentrations using Aitchison geometry. Three case studies in three different Asian cities where the PM coarse, fine, and ultrafine size fraction prevail were investigated and the data was displayed using a dedicated triangular diagram. Simultaneous size-segregated PM measurements, for each case study, were assessed in terms of PM ratios and PM10 levels and were compared to similar measurements reported in literature. Non-central chi-squared distribution quantiles, for each case study, were evaluated and used to investigate the degree of similarity between simultaneous size-segregated PM ratios. Likewise, a comparative number k was used to show the proportion between PM10 levels. The issues relating to the location of the simultaneous size-segregated PM ratios on the triangular diagram were examined and the effects of the non-centrality parameter λ on PM comparison were indicated. The results show that the proposed systematic approach can estimate an explorative quantile (i.e., 2.5%) within which the simultaneous size-segregated PM measurements from one site can be compared with simultaneous size-segregated PM measurements from other sites reported in literature highlighting the existence of possible similarities or correspondences in the kind of sources influencing the PM.

