Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Decision Making: Traditional Method01:14

Decision Making: Traditional Method

5.0K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
5.0K
Decision Making01:20

Decision Making

842
Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
842
Timing and Consequences on Behavior01:08

Timing and Consequences on Behavior

310
In operant conditioning, the timing of reinforcement is crucial. For animals like rats and cats, immediate reinforcement (within a few seconds) is much more effective than delayed reinforcement. For example, a food reward for a rat needs to follow within 30 seconds of pressing a bar to be effective. 
Humans, however, can respond to delayed reinforcers. We often make decisions between immediate small rewards and delayed larger rewards. This ability to delay gratification is a significant...
310
Cognitive Learning01:21

Cognitive Learning

945
Cognitive learning is based on purposive behavior, incidental learning, and insight learning.
E. C. Tolman's theory of purposive behavior emphasizes that much behavior is goal-directed. He argued that to understand behavior, we must look at the entire sequence of actions leading to a goal. For instance, high school students study hard, not just due to past reinforcement but also to achieve the goal of getting into a good college.
Tolman introduced the idea that behavior is influenced by...
945
Decision Making: P-value Method01:09

Decision Making: P-value Method

6.8K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the P-value method includes calculating the P- value using the sample data and interpreting it.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim  is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses:  a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can...
6.8K
Woodward–Hoffmann Selection Rules and Microscopic Reversibility01:34

Woodward–Hoffmann Selection Rules and Microscopic Reversibility

3.7K
Electrocyclic reactions, cycloadditions, and sigmatropic rearrangements are concerted pericyclic reactions that proceed via a cyclic transition state. These reactions are stereospecific and regioselective. The stereochemistry of the products depends on the symmetry characteristics of the interacting orbitals and the reaction conditions. Accordingly, pericyclic reactions are classified as either symmetry-allowed or symmetry-forbidden. Woodward and Hoffmann presented the selection criteria for...
3.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Sequential neural dynamics underlie unconscious integration and conscious perception of visual stimuli.

PLoS biology·2026
Same author

Silver bullets and sensory horizons.

The Behavioral and brain sciences·2026
Same author

Examining the relationship between ssVEP and psychophysical measures of contrast sensitivity, grating acuity, and orientation discrimination.

iScience·2026
Same author

Representational similarity modulates neural and behavioral signatures of novelty.

Neuron·2026
Same author

Linking neural manifolds to circuit structure in recurrent networks.

Neuron·2026
Same author

Biologically informed cortical models predict optogenetic perturbations.

eLife·2026
Same journal

Canonical and phosphoribosyl ubiquitination coordinate to stabilize a proteinaceous structure surrounding the <i>Legionella</i>-containing vacuole.

eLife·2026
Same journal

Celldetective, an AI-enhanced image analysis tool for unraveling dynamic cell interactions.

eLife·2026
Same journal

Dynamic assembly of malate dehydrogenase-citrate synthase multienzyme complex in the mitochondria.

eLife·2026
Same journal

Autosomal allelic inactivation at loci with variable replication timing and dosage sensitivity.

eLife·2026
Same journal

Cribriform plate microenvironment assembles a suppressive myeloid network during EAE-induced neuroinflammation.

eLife·2026
Same journal

Proteomic composition and mutual assembly of the C2a projection in vertebrate motile cilia.

eLife·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 4, 2026

The "Motor" in Implicit Motor Sequence Learning: A Foot-stepping Serial Reaction Time Task
10:39

The "Motor" in Implicit Motor Sequence Learning: A Foot-stepping Serial Reaction Time Task

Published on: May 3, 2018

9.0K

One-shot learning and behavioral eligibility traces in sequential decision making.

Marco P Lehmann1,2, He A Xu3, Vasiliki Liakoni1,2

  • 1Brain-Mind-Institute, School of Life Sciences, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.

Elife
|November 12, 2019
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study demonstrates one-shot learning of action sequences, crucial for reinforcement learning. Researchers observed direct behavioral and physiological evidence of eligibility traces reinforcing actions after a single reward experience.

Keywords:
eligibility tracehumanhuman learningneurosciencepupillometryreinforcement learningreward prediction errorsequential decision making

More Related Videos

Recording Single Neurons' Action Potentials from Freely Moving Pigeons Across Three Stages of Learning
11:20

Recording Single Neurons' Action Potentials from Freely Moving Pigeons Across Three Stages of Learning

Published on: June 2, 2014

12.3K
Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents
07:05

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents

Published on: September 10, 2018

6.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 4, 2026

The "Motor" in Implicit Motor Sequence Learning: A Foot-stepping Serial Reaction Time Task
10:39

The "Motor" in Implicit Motor Sequence Learning: A Foot-stepping Serial Reaction Time Task

Published on: May 3, 2018

9.0K
Recording Single Neurons' Action Potentials from Freely Moving Pigeons Across Three Stages of Learning
11:20

Recording Single Neurons' Action Potentials from Freely Moving Pigeons Across Three Stages of Learning

Published on: June 2, 2014

12.3K
Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents
07:05

Operant Protocols for Assessing the Cost-benefit Analysis During Reinforced Decision Making by Rodents

Published on: September 10, 2018

6.4K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Cognitive Science
  • Computational Neuroscience

Background:

  • Daily tasks involve sequential decision-making, requiring mechanisms to link actions to future rewards.
  • Reinforcement learning (RL) addresses the credit assignment problem using temporal-difference learning or eligibility traces.
  • Eligibility traces enable one-shot learning by reinforcing entire action sequences from single experiences.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate and provide direct evidence for one-shot sequence learning in reinforcement learning.
  • To observe which actions and states are reinforced after a single reward in a multi-step sequence.
  • To differentiate and identify behavioral and physiological signatures of RL with and without eligibility traces.

Main Methods:

  • Development of a novel experimental paradigm to directly observe reinforcement of actions and states in sequences.
  • Analysis focused on states where RL with and without eligibility traces predict distinct outcomes.
  • Measurement of behavioral choices (choice probability) and physiological responses (pupil dilation).

Main Results:

  • Direct behavioral evidence of reinforcement learning with eligibility traces was observed.
  • Physiological signatures, including pupil dilation, also indicated reinforcement learning with eligibility traces.
  • These findings were consistent across multiple sensory modalities.

Conclusions:

  • The study provides direct empirical support for reinforcement learning models incorporating eligibility traces.
  • One-shot learning of action sequences is behaviorally and physiologically observable.
  • Eligibility traces play a significant role in efficient learning from single experiences in complex decision-making.