Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 4, 2026

Experimental Investigation of Secondary Flow Structures Downstream of a Model Type IV Stent Failure in a 180° Curved Artery Test Section
Published on: July 19, 2016
Three dimensional numerical analysis of hemodynamic of stenosed artery considering realistic outlet boundary
Arindam Bit1, Adel Alblawi2, Himadri Chattopadhyay3
1Department of Biomedical Engineering, National Institute of Technology, Raipur, India.
Insights
Numerical simulations reveal that primary stenosis severity and specific outlet boundary conditions significantly influence secondary stenosis progression in the aortic arch. Understanding these hemodynamics aids in predicting and managing vascular disease.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular fluid dynamics
- Biomedical engineering
- Medical imaging analysis
Background:
- Vascular diseases, particularly those affecting blood vessels, contribute significantly to global mortality.
- Late diagnosis of severe stenoses (narrowing) in blood vessels hinders effective treatment due to assessment difficulties.
- Secondary stenoses often develop downstream from primary stenoses, their proliferation influenced by the primary lesion's severity.
Purpose of the Study:
- To numerically investigate blood flow dynamics in patient-specific aortic arch geometries with descending aorta stenoses.
- To predict the distribution of secondary stenoses based on primary stenosis severity and defined flow domain boundary conditions.
- To analyze the impact of various inlet and outlet boundary conditions on flow parameters.
Main Methods:
- Utilized patient-specific aortic arch geometry with descending aorta stenoses for biofluid dynamics estimation.
- Extracted boundary conditions from time-resolved pulsed Doppler Ultrasound imaging.
- Evaluated flow parameters such as wall shear stress and oscillatory shear index under different boundary condition combinations.
Main Results:
- Outlet boundary conditions were found to significantly affect secondary stenosis progression.
- The severity of primary stenoses directly influenced the development of secondary stenoses.
- Specific outlets, namely the Left Subclavian Artery and Left Common Carotid Artery, critically impacted flow dynamics. The lower aortic arch wall showed a higher propensity for secondary stenosis development.
Conclusions:
- The aortic arch is susceptible to secondary stenoses progression when primary stenoses are present in the ascending or descending aorta.
- Findings suggest a potential influence of aneurysms in the descending aorta on the aortic arch's vulnerability.
- This study highlights the importance of considering hemodynamic factors in understanding stenotic lesion development.
Background And Objective:
Mortality rate increases globally among which one third is due to diseased blood vessels. Due to late diagnoses of the disease in vessels (severe stenoses), qualitative and rapid assessment becomes difficult. Earlier assessment of stenoses can lead to formulation of effective treatment protocol. It is often found that proliferation of secondary stenoses at downstream of a stenosed vessel depends on the degree of severity of primary stenoses. Numerical investigation of flow dynamics of blood in such condition helps in prediction of distributed field of secondarystenoses. This investigation also requires consideration of rigorous boundary conditions at inlet and outlet of defined flow domain.
Methods:
Patient-specific geometry of aortic arch with stenoses in descending aorta was considered for numerical estimation of biofluid dynamics. Boundary conditionsat inlet and outlet were extracted from time-resolved pulsed Doppler Ultrasound imaging at appropriate sections of the vessel. Womersley inlet flux was considered. Flow parameters like wall shear stress, oscillatory shear index, etc. were evaluated at upper and lower aortic arch of the vessel at different combinations of boundary conditions at inlet and four outlets respectively.
Results:
Effect of outlet boundary conditions were acknowledged for the progression of secondary stenoses. Severity of primary stenoses was found influencing the progression of secondary stenoses. It was found that the outlets Left Subclavian Artery and Left Common Carotid Artery greatly influence the flow dynamic structure within the stenosed aortic arch. Simultaneously, lower wall of aortic-arch had shown more affinity for secondary stenoses progression.
Conclusion:
Aortic arch is a vital anatomical region of circulatory system which is vulnerable to progression of secondary stenoses in presence of primary stenoses in ascending or descending aorta. It also drives the author to speculate the influence of anurysm in descending aorta on this landmark of aortic arch.
More Related Videos
13:07Optical Coherence Tomography Based Biomechanical Fluid-Structure Interaction Analysis of Coronary Atherosclerosis Progression
Published on: January 15, 2022
06:18Intravascular Ultrasound Image-Based Finite Element Modeling Approach for Quantifying In Vivo Mechanical Properties of Human Coronary Artery
Published on: December 6, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Dimensional Analysis
In fluid mechanics, dimensional...
Steady, Laminar Flow in Circular Tubes
Bernoulli's Equation for Flow Along a Streamline
Steady, Laminar Flow Between Parallel Plates
Bernoulli's Equation for Flow Normal to a Streamline
The pressure difference depends on the fluid's velocity and radius of curvature. The pressure variation is minimal in flows with nearly straight streamlines. However, the...
Navier–Stokes Equations