Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 4, 2026

Working Memory Training for Older Participants: A Control Group Training Regimen and Initial Intellectual Functioning Assessment
Published on: September 20, 2020
Working memory training and brain structure and function in extremely preterm or extremely low birth weight children
Claire E Kelly1,2, Deanne K Thompson1,2,3,4, Jian Chen2
1Victorian Infant Brain Studies (VIBeS), Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Insights
Adaptive working memory training in extremely preterm/low birth weight children showed minimal brain changes compared to placebo. While some structural and functional brain alterations occurred, they were not clearly linked to the Cogmed intervention itself.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Developmental Psychology
- Pediatrics
Background:
- Children born extremely preterm (EP) or extremely low birth weight (ELBW) often experience cognitive challenges.
- Working memory deficits are common in this population.
- Neuroplasticity is a potential target for interventions.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate if adaptive working memory training (Cogmed) induces structural or functional brain changes in EP/ELBW children compared to a placebo.
- To assess neuroplasticity following cognitive training in a vulnerable pediatric population.
Main Methods:
- Ninety-one EP/ELBW children (mean age 7.8 years) were randomized to Cogmed or placebo training.
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) including structural, diffusion, and functional (fMRI) scans were acquired pre- and post-intervention.
- Statistical analyses examined changes in brain morphometry, white matter microstructure, and BOLD signal during an n-back task, with interaction analyses between group and time.
Main Results:
- Both Cogmed and placebo groups showed increased neurite density in white matter regions.
- Functional MRI revealed increased BOLD signal in specific cortical areas during working memory tasks in the Cogmed group, but not the placebo group.
- Evidence for group-by-time interactions was weak, indicating minimal differences in brain changes between the Cogmed and placebo groups.
Conclusions:
- While some structural and functional brain changes occurred between pre- and post-training in EP/ELBW children, these changes were generally observed in both Cogmed and placebo groups.
- There was little evidence to suggest that the Cogmed intervention specifically induced neuroplasticity beyond placebo effects.
- Further research is needed to identify effective interventions for cognitive enhancement in EP/ELBW children.
Abstract:
This study in children born extremely preterm (EP; <28 weeks' gestational age) or extremely low birth weight (ELBW; <1,000 g) investigated whether adaptive working memory training using Cogmed® is associated with structural and/or functional brain changes compared with a placebo program. Ninety-one EP/ELBW children were recruited at a mean (standard deviation) age of 7.8 (0.4) years. Children were randomly allocated to Cogmed or placebo (45-min sessions, 5 days a week over 5-7 weeks). A subset had usable magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data pretraining and 2 weeks posttraining (structural, n = 48; diffusion, n = 43; task-based functional, n = 18). Statistical analyses examined whether cortical morphometry, white matter microstructure and blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) signal during an n-back working memory task changed from pretraining to posttraining in the Cogmed and placebo groups separately. Interaction analyses between time point and group were then performed. There was a significant increase in neurite density in several white matter regions from pretraining to posttraining in both the Cogmed and placebo groups. BOLD signal in the posterior cingulate and precuneus cortices during the n-back task increased from pretraining to posttraining in the Cogmed but not placebo group. Evidence for group-by-time interactions for the MRI measures was weak, suggesting that brain changes generally did not differ between Cogmed and placebo groups. Overall, while some structural and functional MRI changes between the pretraining and posttraining period in EP/ELBW children were observed, there was little evidence of training-induced neuroplasticity, with changes generally identified in both groups. Trial registration Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, anzctr.org.au; ACTRN12612000124831.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Information Processing Approach
Working Memory
Role of Cerebellum and Prefrontal Cortex in Memory
Neuroplasticity
Language and Cognition

