Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 4, 2026

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
Published on: June 12, 2020
Phase II/III Study of Lisdexamfetamine Dimesylate in Japanese Pediatric Patients with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity
Hironobu Ichikawa1, Tasuku Miyajima2, Yushiro Yamashita3
1Japan Developmental Disorders Network, Tokyo, Japan.
Insights
Lisdexamfetamine dimesylate (LDX) effectively treated attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in Japanese children. The study confirmed LDX
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Psychiatry
- Neurodevelopmental Disorders
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a prevalent neurodevelopmental disorder in children.
- Lisdexamfetamine dimesylate (LDX) is an established treatment for ADHD, but its efficacy and safety in Japanese pediatric populations require specific investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy and safety of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate (LDX) in Japanese pediatric patients diagnosed with ADHD.
- To compare the effects of different LDX dosages (30, 50, and 70 mg/day) against a placebo over a 4-week treatment period.
Main Methods:
- A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was conducted.
- 76 Japanese pediatric patients (6-17 years) with ADHD received LDX (30, 50, or 70 mg/day) or placebo for 4 weeks.
- Efficacy was assessed using the ADHD Rating Scale-IV (ADHD-RS-IV), Conners' Third Edition (Japanese version), Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I), and Parent Global Assessment (PGA) scales.
Main Results:
- All LDX dosage groups showed statistically significant improvements in ADHD-RS-IV total scores compared to placebo (p < 0.0001).
- Significant improvements were also observed in Conners 3 inattention/hyperactivity subscales and CGI-I/PGA scores for LDX groups versus placebo.
- LDX was generally well-tolerated, with decreased appetite, headache, and initial insomnia being the most frequent adverse events.
Conclusions:
- Lisdexamfetamine dimesylate (30, 50, and 70 mg/day) demonstrated superior efficacy over placebo in Japanese pediatric patients with ADHD.
- No significant safety or tolerability concerns specific to this population were identified, supporting LDX as a viable treatment option.
Abstract:
To further define the efficacy and safety profiles of lisdexamfetamine dimesylate (LDX) in Japanese pediatric patients with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). This was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of LDX 30, 50, or 70 mg/day for 4 weeks in 76 patients 6-17 years of age with ADHD in Japan. The primary efficacy endpoint was the change in the ADHD Rating Scale-IV (ADHD-RS-IV) total score from baseline to 4 weeks. Secondary efficacy endpoints were: Conners' Third Edition (Japanese version) Parent Rating Scale (Conners 3), Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I) scale, and Parent Global Assessment (PGA) scale. Change in the ADHD-RS-IV total score from baseline to 4 weeks was significantly greater (p < 0.0001) in all LDX dosage groups versus placebo (30 mg, -16.38; 50 mg, -18.10; 70 mg, -16.47; placebo, -2.78). At all time points, improvements (decreases) in the ADHD-RS-IV total score were significantly greater in all LDX groups versus placebo. At weeks 3 and 4, improvements from baseline in Conners 3 inattention plus hyperactivity/impulsivity subscale scores were significantly greater (p ≤ 0.0082) for all LDX dosages versus placebo. At week 4, the proportion of LDX-treated patients "much improved" or "very much improved" was 61%-71% on the CGI-I scale (p ≤ 0.0019) and 56%-65% on the PGA scale (p ≤ 0.0170). LDX was generally well tolerated. The most frequent treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) were decreased appetite, headache, and initial insomnia. No severe/serious AEs occurred, and no AEs specific to Japanese patients were evident. The superiority of LDX 30, 50, and 70 mg/day over placebo was confirmed in Japanese pediatric patients with ADHD, and no major safety or tolerability concerns were identified.
More Related Videos
10:02Event Related Potentials ERPs and other EEG Based Methods for Extracting Biomarkers of Brain Dysfunction: Examples from Pediatric Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder ADHD
Published on: March 12, 2020
13:09Using Brain Activation nir-HEG/Q-EEG and Execution Measures CPTs in a ADHD Assessment Protocol
Published on: April 1, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder
Diagnostic Criteria and Symptoms
To diagnose ADHD, symptoms must manifest before age 12 and be evident across multiple settings....
Pharmacokinetics in Pediatric Patients: Drug Metabolism
Clinical Trials: Overview