Related Experiment Videos
Why public funding for non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) might still be wrong: a response to Bunnik and colleagues
1Department of History, Theory and Ethics in Medicine, Medical School, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany daschmitz@ukaachen.de.
Journal of Medical Ethics
|November 14, 2019
Abstract:
Bunnik and colleagues argued that financial barriers do not promote informed decision-making prior to prenatal screening and raise justice concerns. If public funding is provided, however, it would seem to be important to clarify its intentions and avoid any unwarranted appearance of a medical utility of the testing.