Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Receiver Operating Characteristic Plot01:15

Receiver Operating Characteristic Plot

452
A ROC (Receiver Operating Characteristic) plot is a graphical tool used to assess the performance of a binary classification model by illustrating the trade-off between sensitivity (true positive rate) and specificity (false positive rate). By plotting sensitivity against 1 - specificity across various threshold settings, the ROC curve shows how well the model distinguishes between classes, with a curve closer to the top-left corner indicating a more accurate model. The area under the ROC curve...
452
Guidelines and Strategies for Safe Computer Charting01:18

Guidelines and Strategies for Safe Computer Charting

2.6K
The guidelines and strategies provided by the American Nurses Association (ANA) and the Canadian Nurses Association (CNA) offer essential principles for ensuring safe and secure computer charting systems in healthcare settings. Let's break down each recommendation:
Maintain Confidentiality and Security:
2.6K
Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value01:13

Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value

1.2K
In healthcare diagnostics, laboratory tests play a crucial role in identifying and diagnosing a wide range of medical conditions. However, interpreting test results is not always straightforward. An abnormal test result does not always confirm the presence of a disease, just as a normal result does not guarantee its absence. To assess the reliability of these diagnostic tools, healthcare practitioners rely on two key statistical indicators: sensitivity and specificity.
Sensitivity is the...
1.2K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Looking at Optic Nerve Sheath Meningiomas Through Genetics-From Clinic to Bench and Back Again.

Frontiers in bioscience (Scholar edition)·2026
Same author

Publisher Correction: Clinical evaluation of a new fully automated biometer integrating optical low-coherence reflectometry and Placido-disk topography.

Eye and vision (London, England)·2026
Same author

Archetypal Visual Field Analysis of Patients With Chronic Leber Hereditary Optic Neuropathy in Relation to Visual Recovery.

Investigative ophthalmology & visual science·2026
Same author

Comment on: Global consensus on the evidence-based functional classification of simultaneous vision IOLs.

Journal of cataract and refractive surgery·2026
Same author

Clinical evaluation of a new fully automated biometer integrating optical low-coherence reflectometry and Placido-disk topography.

Eye and vision (London, England)·2026
Same author

A spreadsheet-based algorithm for objective assessment of depth of focus from defocus curves.

Journal of cataract and refractive surgery·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 4, 2026

Enabling High Grayscale Resolution Displays and Accurate Response Time Measurements on Conventional Computers
06:50

Enabling High Grayscale Resolution Displays and Accurate Response Time Measurements on Conventional Computers

Published on: February 29, 2012

9.7K

Precision and Normative Values of a New Computerized Chart for Contrast Sensitivity Testing.

Giacomo Savini1, Antonio Calossi2, Domenico Schiano-Lomoriello3

  • 1IRCCS - Fondazione Bietti, Rome, Italy. giacomo.savini@alice.it.

Scientific Reports
|November 14, 2019
PubMed
Summary

This study established a normative database for a grating test of contrast sensitivity, demonstrating high repeatability and responsiveness to cataract surgery. The test is clinically useful, though a ceiling effect was noted in healthy individuals.

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Assessment of Visual Acuity in Central Vision Loss Through Motion-Based Peripheral Vision Testing
06:25

Author Spotlight: Assessment of Visual Acuity in Central Vision Loss Through Motion-Based Peripheral Vision Testing

Published on: February 23, 2024

1.1K
Author Spotlight: An Automated Method for Assessing Visual Acuity in Infants and Toddlers Using an Eye-Tracking System
05:10

Author Spotlight: An Automated Method for Assessing Visual Acuity in Infants and Toddlers Using an Eye-Tracking System

Published on: March 17, 2023

3.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 4, 2026

Enabling High Grayscale Resolution Displays and Accurate Response Time Measurements on Conventional Computers
06:50

Enabling High Grayscale Resolution Displays and Accurate Response Time Measurements on Conventional Computers

Published on: February 29, 2012

9.7K
Author Spotlight: Assessment of Visual Acuity in Central Vision Loss Through Motion-Based Peripheral Vision Testing
06:25

Author Spotlight: Assessment of Visual Acuity in Central Vision Loss Through Motion-Based Peripheral Vision Testing

Published on: February 23, 2024

1.1K
Author Spotlight: An Automated Method for Assessing Visual Acuity in Infants and Toddlers Using an Eye-Tracking System
05:10

Author Spotlight: An Automated Method for Assessing Visual Acuity in Infants and Toddlers Using an Eye-Tracking System

Published on: March 17, 2023

3.6K

Area of Science:

  • Ophthalmology
  • Vision Science
  • Medical Technology

Background:

  • Contrast sensitivity is crucial for visual function.
  • Accurate measurement tools are needed for clinical assessment.
  • Existing methods may have limitations in repeatability or clinical application.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To create a normative database for a grating test of contrast sensitivity using a high-definition LCD monitor.
  • To validate the test's repeatability and responsiveness to cataract surgery.
  • To establish clinical utility for contrast sensitivity assessment.

Main Methods:

  • A grating contrast sensitivity test (Vision Chart, CSO) was administered to healthy volunteers and cataract patients.
  • Measurements were taken at spatial frequencies of 1.5, 3, 6, 12, and 18 cycles per degree.
  • Repeatability was assessed via intra-session test-retest variability and coefficient of variation; responsiveness was evaluated post-cataract surgery.

Main Results:

  • The test demonstrated high repeatability, with low test-retest variability (0.05-0.23 Log CS) and coefficient of variation (0.61-4.21%).
  • Normative data revealed highest median values at lower spatial frequencies (1.5, 3, 6 cpd), indicating a potential ceiling effect.
  • Cataract patients showed significant improvement in contrast sensitivity across all tested frequencies post-surgery.

Conclusions:

  • The grating contrast sensitivity test provides repeatable and clinically valuable measurements.
  • The test is sensitive to improvements following cataract surgery.
  • A ceiling effect in healthy eyes necessitates careful interpretation of results at high contrast sensitivity levels.