Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Classification of Bones01:18

Classification of Bones

9.4K
The bones of the human skeletal system are of varied shapes, sizes, and functions. They can be classified based on their shape and function into four major classes: long bones, short bones, flat bones, and irregular bones. Some classifications include a fifth type, the sesamoid bones, as a separate class, whereas others categorize them under short bones.
Long and Short Bones
The appendicular skeleton, particularly the upper and lower limbs, is primarily made of long and short bones. The...
9.4K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Clinical and Patient-Reported Outcomes After Treatment of Bilateral Condylar Fractures: Results of a Retrospective Cohort Study Derived From the BCFx Registry.

Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons·2026
Same author

Patient-Specific Devices for Surgical Treatment of Mandibular Condylar Head Fractures: Case Series of Early Experiences and Pitfalls.

Journal of maxillofacial and oral surgery·2026
Same author

Enhancing the functional outcome: a modified bow incision technique for release of tongue adhesions after floor of the mouth resections.

Journal of stomatology, oral and maxillofacial surgery·2026
Same author

Surgical Performance of 3D-Printed Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) Patient-Specific Implants and Titanium Mesh in Clinically Matched Orbital Reconstruction: A Cadaveric Study.

Craniomaxillofacial trauma & reconstruction·2026
Same author

A Prospective, International, Multicentre Registry of Patients Undergoing Segmental Mandibular Defect Reconstruction After Mandibular Resection for Tumours and Drug-Induced Osteonecrosis: A Study Protocol.

Craniomaxillofacial trauma & reconstruction·2026
Same author

Unilateral patient specific total temporomandibular joint reconstruction plus contralateral mandibular sagittal split osteotomy - indications and functional outcomes in comparison to total temporomandibular joint reconstruction alone.

Journal of cranio-maxillo-facial surgery : official publication of the European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 4, 2026

A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible
10:42

A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible

Published on: January 28, 2020

6.9K

The Comprehensive AO CMF Classification System for Mandibular Fractures: A Multicenter Validation Study.

Paul A Mittermiller1, Serena S Bidwell1, Florian M Thieringer2

  • 1Stanford-Surgery Policy Improvement Research and Education (S-SPIRE) Center, Department of Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, California.

Craniomaxillofacial Trauma & Reconstruction
|November 14, 2019
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

The AO CMF classification system for mandibular fractures is reliable and accurate for most variables, particularly Level 2. However, Level 3 variables showed decreased reliability for condylar process fractures, requiring further investigation.

Keywords:
classificationcomputed tomographyfracturesinterobserver reliabilitymandibular fracturesmidfacevalidation

More Related Videos

Less-Invasive Technique for Non-stabilized Mandibular Fracture in Mouse Models
04:13

Less-Invasive Technique for Non-stabilized Mandibular Fracture in Mouse Models

Published on: September 27, 2024

734
A Morphometric and Cellular Analysis Method for the Murine Mandibular Condyle
08:07

A Morphometric and Cellular Analysis Method for the Murine Mandibular Condyle

Published on: January 11, 2018

8.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 4, 2026

A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible
10:42

A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible

Published on: January 28, 2020

6.9K
Less-Invasive Technique for Non-stabilized Mandibular Fracture in Mouse Models
04:13

Less-Invasive Technique for Non-stabilized Mandibular Fracture in Mouse Models

Published on: September 27, 2024

734
A Morphometric and Cellular Analysis Method for the Murine Mandibular Condyle
08:07

A Morphometric and Cellular Analysis Method for the Murine Mandibular Condyle

Published on: January 11, 2018

8.8K

Area of Science:

  • Craniomaxillofacial (CMF) surgery
  • Trauma classification systems
  • Medical imaging analysis

Background:

  • The AO CMF introduced a comprehensive, hierarchical classification system for CMF fractures.
  • This system, with levels 1, 2, and 3, addresses fracture presence, location, and morphology.
  • Validation is crucial for reliable clinical and research application of the AO CMF classification.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To validate the AO CMF classification system's three modules for adult mandibular fractures.
  • To assess interobserver reliability and accuracy at different precision levels (Level 2 vs. Level 3).
  • To evaluate the impact of assessor experience on classification performance.

Main Methods:

  • A total of 15 subjects provided classifications for 200 mandibular fracture CT scans using the AO CMF system.
  • Interobserver reliability was measured using Fleiss' kappa, and accuracy by percentage agreement with a reference assessor.
  • Statistical analysis (Kruskal-Wallis, Wilcoxon's rank-sum tests) compared reliability and accuracy across variables, regions, and experience levels.

Main Results:

  • The AO CMF classification system demonstrated good reliability and accuracy for most Level 2 and Level 3 variables.
  • Level 2 variables showed significantly higher interobserver reliability (kappa: 0.69) and accuracy (94% agreement) than Level 3 variables (kappa: 0.59, 91% agreement).
  • Lower reliability was noted for specific Level 3 variables, including condylar process fractures and displacement, with higher reliability observed in more experienced assessors.

Conclusions:

  • The AO CMF classification system is currently suitable for clinical and research use for mandibular fractures, especially Level 2 variables.
  • Further investigation is needed to address the decreased accuracy and reliability of Level 3 variables, particularly for condylar process fractures.
  • Refinements to the system and user instructions may be necessary to improve classification consistency for complex mandibular fractures.