Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 4, 2026

Modeling Brain Metastases Through Intracranial Injection and Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Published on: June 7, 2020
Modeling multi-needle injection into solid tumor
Vladimir Subbotin1, Gennady Fiksel2
1602 Samuel Drive Madison, WI 53717, USA.
Abstract:
The discovery of mechanisms by which the cancer cells avoid the host immune attack (immune checkpoints) as well the capability of the monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) to blockade the checkpoint proteins on cancer and tumor-infiltrating cells (CTLA-4, PD-1, and PD-L1) promised new breakthroughs in the cure of cancer. After these mechanisms of cancer escaping the host immunity were undoubtedly confirmed in numerous experimental and clinical studies, the FDA approval of CTLA-4 and PD-1/PD-L1 mAbs for systemic treatment thought to revolutionize the outcome of cancer treatment. However, as of today, the anticipated curative effect of anti-CTLA-4 and PD-1/PD-L1 mAb treatments has been observed only in a small population of patients. In addition, systemic administration of mAbs in clinics has been found associated with new toxicity profiles, sometimes very severe. The main obstacle that hinders the mAbs therapy appears to be the inability of delivering mAbs to a sufficient number of cancer cells and tumor infiltrating cells. As an alternative to the systemic administration (or as a complement to it), local intratumoral delivery of mAbs has been anticipated to resolve that issue. However, unlike the systemic mAbs administration, for which formidable but surmountable obstacles (big size of mAbs ~150 kD, high interstitial fluid pressure in solid tumors, etc.) have been known to hamper mAbs delivery to cancer and tumor-infiltrating cells, the lack of effects of intratumoral mAbs administration remains completely incomprehensible and needs a new theoretical reconsideration that we have attempted in our analysis. It can be suggested that the limited benefits of the intratumoral mAbs administration appeared to be rooted in the same problem that hindered the effects of systemic mAbs administration: the inability to reach a sufficient number of cancer cells and tumor-infiltrating cells. We hypothesize that the core of the problem stems from the fact that the single-needle intratumoral injection forms a very localized, jet-like distribution of the drug (mAbs) that constitutes only a small fraction of the total volume of the tumor. In this light we are re-evaluating the theoretical reasonableness of the single-needle intratumoral injection approach. We propose that multi-needle injection will circumvent this limitation and for that we analyze the behavior of an injectant in tissues using different configurations of the injection needles. To accomplish this goal, we created a model of injectant distribution in a solid tissue based on the traditional technique of single-needle injection and then extended that model to a case of simultaneous multi-needle injection. To develop the model of drug delivery and transport in biological tissues, we followed a frequently used approach of modeling the diffusive transport of liquid through a porous media using the Darcy's law that relates the flow velocity, the pressure gradient, and the tissue permeability. The analysis demonstrates that a multi-needle injection setup provides a significantly more widespread and homogeneous injectant distribution within a solid tumor than that for a single needle injection for the same tumor size. Adding separate draining needles can further improve the delivery of injectant to cancer and tumor-infiltrating cells.
Insights
Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) show limited cancer treatment benefits due to poor drug delivery. Multi-needle intratumoral injections improve mAb distribution in tumors, overcoming limitations of single-needle methods for better cancer immunotherapy.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Immunology
- Biomedical Engineering
Background:
- Cancer cells evade immune attack via immune checkpoints.
- Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) targeting CTLA-4, PD-1, and PD-L1 offer potential cancer cures.
- Current mAb therapies show limited efficacy and severe toxicities, primarily due to poor drug delivery.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the limitations of current intratumoral mAb delivery methods.
- To propose and analyze multi-needle injection as an improved delivery strategy.
- To re-evaluate the theoretical basis of single-needle intratumoral injection.
Main Methods:
- Developed a model of injectant distribution in solid tumors using Darcy's law for porous media flow.
- Extended the model from single-needle to simultaneous multi-needle injection.
- Analyzed injectant distribution patterns with varying needle configurations and draining needles.
Main Results:
- Single-needle injection results in localized drug distribution, a small fraction of tumor volume.
- Multi-needle injection significantly improves widespread and homogeneous injectant distribution.
- Incorporating draining needles further enhances drug delivery to target cells.
Conclusions:
- The limited efficacy of current mAb therapies stems from inadequate drug distribution.
- Multi-needle intratumoral injection offers a superior method for delivering mAbs to tumors.
- This approach holds promise for enhancing the effectiveness of cancer immunotherapy.

