Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Kinematic Equations: Problem Solving01:15

Kinematic Equations: Problem Solving

27.2K
When analyzing one-dimensional motion with constant acceleration, the problem-solving strategy involves identifying the known quantities and choosing the appropriate kinematic equations to solve for the unknowns. Either one or two kinematic equations are needed to solve for the unknowns, depending on the known and unknown quantities. Generally, the number of equations required is the same as the number of unknown quantities in the given example. Two-body pursuit problems always require two...
27.2K
Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes01:25

Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes

833
Consider a component AB undergoing a linear motion. Along with a linear motion, point B also rotates around point A. To comprehend this complex movement, position vectors for both points A and B are established using a stationary reference frame.
However, to express the relative position of point B relative to point A, an additional frame of reference, denoted as x'y', is necessary. This additional frame not only translates but also rotates relative to the fixed frame, making it...
833
Kinematic Equations - III01:18

Kinematic Equations - III

10.1K
The first two kinematic equations have time as a variable, but the third kinematic equation is independent of time. This equation expresses final velocity as a function of the acceleration and distance over which it acts. The fourth kinematic equation does not have an acceleration term and provides the final position of the object at time t in terms of the initial and final velocities. This equation is useful when the value of the constant acceleration is unknown.
Using the kinematic equations,...
10.1K
Kinematic Equations - II01:17

Kinematic Equations - II

12.7K
The second kinematic equation expresses the final position of an object in terms of its initial position, the distance traveled with the initial constant velocity, and the distance traveled due to a change in velocity. Similar to the first kinematic equation, this equation is also only valid when the acceleration is constant throughout the motion of an object.
Suppose a car merges into freeway traffic on a 200 m long ramp. If its initial velocity is 10 m/s and it accelerates at 2 m/s2, then the...
12.7K
Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes-Problem Solving01:29

Relative Motion Analysis using Rotating Axes-Problem Solving

663
Consider a crane whose telescopic boom rotates with an angular velocity of 0.04 rad/s and angular acceleration of 0.02 rad/s2. Along with the rotation, the boom also extends linearly with a uniform speed of 5 m/s. The extension of the boom is measured at point D, which is measured with respect to the fixed point C on the other end of the boom. For the given instant, the distance between points C and D is 60 meters.
Here, in order to determine the magnitude of velocity and acceleration for point...
663
Kinematic Equations - I01:26

Kinematic Equations - I

14.0K
When an object moves with constant acceleration, the velocity of the object changes at a constant rate throughout the motion. The kinematic equations of motions are derived for such cases where the acceleration of the object is constant. The first kinematic equation gives an insight into the relationship between velocity, acceleration, and time. We can see, for example:
14.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Evaluating Nursing Work Systems and Identifying Barriers for Robotic Technology Integration: Observational Study.

Journal of medical Internet research·2026
Same author

Behind the Curtain of the Faculty Job Interview Process.

Journal of applied biomechanics·2026
Same author

Weight-bearing symmetry changes after asymmetric surface stiffness walking.

Journal of neurophysiology·2026
Same author

Adjustable Compliance Footwear Technology to Investigate Gait Adaptation.

IEEE robotics and automation letters·2025
Same author

Gait adaptation to asymmetric foot-ground compliance applied by robotic footwear.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025
Same author

Weight-bearing symmetry changes after asymmetric surface stiffness walking.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 3, 2026

Movement Retraining using Real-time Feedback of Performance
08:16

Movement Retraining using Real-time Feedback of Performance

Published on: January 17, 2013

13.7K

A model-based motion capture marker location refinement approach using inverse kinematics from dynamic trials.

Mark A Price1, Andrew K LaPrè2, Russell T Johnson3

  • 1Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts.

International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering
|November 14, 2019
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces an automated algorithm to optimize marker placement for motion capture, significantly reducing tracking errors in human body kinematics analysis. The method enhances the accuracy and reliability of motion analysis for dynamic movements.

Keywords:
biomechanical optimizationmotion capturesubject-specific models

More Related Videos

Sit-to-stand-and-walk from 120% Knee Height: A Novel Approach to Assess Dynamic Postural Control Independent of Lead-limb
08:24

Sit-to-stand-and-walk from 120% Knee Height: A Novel Approach to Assess Dynamic Postural Control Independent of Lead-limb

Published on: August 30, 2016

10.6K
Estimation of Contact Regions Between Hands and Objects During Human Multi-Digit Grasping
09:41

Estimation of Contact Regions Between Hands and Objects During Human Multi-Digit Grasping

Published on: April 21, 2023

2.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 3, 2026

Movement Retraining using Real-time Feedback of Performance
08:16

Movement Retraining using Real-time Feedback of Performance

Published on: January 17, 2013

13.7K
Sit-to-stand-and-walk from 120% Knee Height: A Novel Approach to Assess Dynamic Postural Control Independent of Lead-limb
08:24

Sit-to-stand-and-walk from 120% Knee Height: A Novel Approach to Assess Dynamic Postural Control Independent of Lead-limb

Published on: August 30, 2016

10.6K
Estimation of Contact Regions Between Hands and Objects During Human Multi-Digit Grasping
09:41

Estimation of Contact Regions Between Hands and Objects During Human Multi-Digit Grasping

Published on: April 21, 2023

2.1K

Area of Science:

  • Biomechanics
  • Human Motion Analysis
  • Computer Vision

Background:

  • Marker-based motion capture is standard for human body kinematics.
  • Accurate mapping of physical to model marker positions is crucial.
  • Manual marker placement is time-consuming and prone to human error.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop an optimization algorithm for automated model marker placement.
  • To minimize marker tracking error during inverse kinematics analysis of dynamic human motion.
  • To improve the accuracy and reduce variability in human motion analysis.

Main Methods:

  • An optimization algorithm sequentially adjusts 3D model marker locations.
  • Inverse kinematics is used to calculate tracking error after each adjustment.
  • Marker coordinates are adjusted based on error reduction, with adjustable thresholds and locking for artifacts.

Main Results:

  • Average root mean square (RMS) tracking error decreased by 38.4%.
  • Average RMS tracking error variance decreased by 53.7%.
  • Resulting joint kinematics aligned with established literature values.

Conclusions:

  • The automated algorithm effectively minimizes marker tracking error and variance.
  • This method yields realistic human kinematics and reduces subjectivity in model building.
  • The approach provides accurate motion analysis below accepted error thresholds.