Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Transcription Factors02:16

Transcription Factors

82.1K
Tissue-specific transcription factors contribute to diverse cellular functions in mammals. For example, the gene for beta globin, a major component of hemoglobin, is present in all cells of the body. However, it is only expressed in red blood cells because the transcription factors that can bind to the promoter sequences of the beta globin gene are only expressed in these cells. Tissue-specific transcription factors also ensure that mutations in these factors may impair only the function of...
82.1K
Cooperative Binding of Transcription Regulators02:13

Cooperative Binding of Transcription Regulators

2.4K
2.4K
Cooperative Binding of Transcription Regulators02:13

Cooperative Binding of Transcription Regulators

7.1K
Transcriptional regulators bind to specific cis-regulatory sequences in the DNA to regulate gene transcription. These cis-regulatory sequences are very short, usually less than ten nucleotide pairs in length. The short length means that there is a high probability of the exact same sequence randomly occurring throughout the genome.  Since regulators can also bind to groups of similar sequences, this further increases the chances of random binding. Transcriptional regulators form...
7.1K
General Transcription Factors01:30

General Transcription Factors

6.6K
Tissue-specific transcription factors contribute to diverse cellular functions in mammals. For example, the gene for beta globin, a major component of hemoglobin, is present in all cells of the body. However, it is only expressed in red blood cells because the transcription factors that can bind to the promoter sequences of the beta globin gene are only expressed in these cells. Tissue-specific transcription factors also ensure that mutations in these factors may impair only the function of...
6.6K
RNA Polymerase II Accessory Proteins02:36

RNA Polymerase II Accessory Proteins

10.6K
Proteins that regulate transcription can do so either via direct contact with RNA Polymerase or through indirect interactions facilitated by adaptors, mediators, histone-modifying proteins, and nucleosome remodelers. Direct interactions to activate transcription is seen in bacteria as well as in some eukaryotic genes. In these cases, upstream activation sequences are adjacent to the promoters, and the activator proteins interact directly with the transcriptional machinery. For example, in...
10.6K
Master Transcription Regulators02:23

Master Transcription Regulators

7.6K
Master transcription regulators are regulatory proteins that are predominantly responsible for regulating the expression of multiple genes. Often these genes work in concert to drive a  complex process. Activation of a master transcription regulator can lead to a cascade of transcriptional activation necessary for that outcome. These regulators can directly bind to the regulatory sequences of the various genes involved, or they can indirectly regulate transcription by binding to regulatory...
7.6K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Continuous multi-omics pathway enrichment analysis resolves hidden functional heterogeneity.

Briefings in bioinformatics·2026
Same author

Improved RNA-DNA interaction calling suggests RNA-based gene regulation of phenotypic transitions.

Nucleic acids research·2026
Same author

Predicting gene-specific regulation with transcriptomic and epigenetic single-cell data.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same author

Probing transcription factor subsets in gene regulatory networks.

Algorithms for molecular biology : AMB·2026
Same author

Quantifying Components in a Model Vaccine with Machine-Learning-Augmented Raman Spectroscopy.

Analytical chemistry·2026
Same author

Cell type-specific epigenetic regulatory circuitry of coronary artery disease loci.

Nature communications·2026
Same journal

Cyber Military Operations under International Humanitarian Law: Interpreting the Concept of "Attack" and Challenges in Protecting Civilians.

F1000Research·2026
Same journal

Sentiment Analysis of Acceptance TVET Online Courses on the Skill Academy App from Google Play: Leveraging Text Mining with Comparison Machine Learning Model.

F1000Research·2026
Same journal

Emotional intelligence: An important skill to learn now more than ever.

F1000Research·2026
Same journal

East Mediterranean Lineage of <i>Brucella melitensis</i> in Human Isolates and Milk Samples in Oman Using MLVA-14.

F1000Research·2026
Same journal

Application of K-Means Clustering for Job Applicant Analysis in Construction Firms Using R.

F1000Research·2026
Same journal

The influence of self-esteem and emotional intelligence on addiction to social networks in Peruvian university students.

F1000Research·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 3, 2026

Author Spotlight: Impact of Intergenic Interactions on Disease-Identifying Dark Biomarkers
03:37

Author Spotlight: Impact of Intergenic Interactions on Disease-Identifying Dark Biomarkers

Published on: March 1, 2024

1.2K

Predicting transcription factor binding using ensemble random forest models.

Fatemeh Behjati Ardakani1,2,3, Florian Schmidt1,2,3,4, Marcel H Schulz1,2,5

  • 1High throughput Genomics and Systems Biology, Cluster of Excellence on Multimodel Computing and Interaction, Saarland University, Saarbruecken,, Saarland, 66123, Germany.

F1000Research
|November 19, 2019
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces an ensemble learning method for predicting transcription factor (TF) binding sites, improving accuracy across different cell types. The approach effectively uses DNase1-seq data and TF motifs, reducing false positives in gene regulation studies.

Keywords:
Chromatin accessibilityDNase1-seqENCODE-DREAM in vivo Transcription Factor binding site prediction challengeEnsemble learningIndirect-bindingTF-complexesTranscription Factors

More Related Videos

High Sensitivity Measurement of Transcription Factor-DNA Binding Affinities by Competitive Titration Using Fluorescence Microscopy
06:38

High Sensitivity Measurement of Transcription Factor-DNA Binding Affinities by Competitive Titration Using Fluorescence Microscopy

Published on: February 7, 2019

9.1K
Identifying Transcription Factor Olig2 Genomic Binding Sites in Acutely Purified PDGFR&#945;+ Cells by Low-cell Chromatin Immunoprecipitation Sequencing Analysis
12:29

Identifying Transcription Factor Olig2 Genomic Binding Sites in Acutely Purified PDGFRα+ Cells by Low-cell Chromatin Immunoprecipitation Sequencing Analysis

Published on: April 16, 2018

9.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 3, 2026

Author Spotlight: Impact of Intergenic Interactions on Disease-Identifying Dark Biomarkers
03:37

Author Spotlight: Impact of Intergenic Interactions on Disease-Identifying Dark Biomarkers

Published on: March 1, 2024

1.2K
High Sensitivity Measurement of Transcription Factor-DNA Binding Affinities by Competitive Titration Using Fluorescence Microscopy
06:38

High Sensitivity Measurement of Transcription Factor-DNA Binding Affinities by Competitive Titration Using Fluorescence Microscopy

Published on: February 7, 2019

9.1K
Identifying Transcription Factor Olig2 Genomic Binding Sites in Acutely Purified PDGFR&#945;+ Cells by Low-cell Chromatin Immunoprecipitation Sequencing Analysis
12:29

Identifying Transcription Factor Olig2 Genomic Binding Sites in Acutely Purified PDGFRα+ Cells by Low-cell Chromatin Immunoprecipitation Sequencing Analysis

Published on: April 16, 2018

9.7K

Area of Science:

  • Genomics
  • Computational Biology
  • Molecular Biology

Background:

  • Transcription factor (TF) binding site prediction is crucial for understanding gene regulation.
  • Challenges include short DNA motifs and cell-type specific co-factors influencing TF binding.
  • DNase1-seq data and position-specific energy matrices (PSEMs) offer potential for TF binding prediction.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a general computational model for predicting TF binding sites.
  • To evaluate an ensemble learning approach using random forest classifiers.
  • To improve the accuracy and generalizability of TF binding predictions.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized TF ChIP-seq data as the gold standard for training and evaluation.
  • Developed a novel ensemble learning approach with random forest classifiers.
  • Incorporated DNase1-seq peaks to enhance prediction specificity.

Main Results:

  • The ensemble learning model demonstrated superior generalization across tissues and cell types compared to individual classifiers.
  • Using DNase1-seq peaks significantly reduced the false positive rate in TF binding predictions.
  • Models prioritized TF motifs that are known protein-protein interaction partners.

Conclusions:

  • Ensemble learning provides a robust framework for predicting TF binding sites.
  • DNase1-seq peak data is essential for accurate and specific TF binding predictions.
  • TF binding prediction models can reveal insights into regulatory network interactions.