Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 3, 2026

Optimized Management of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke
Published on: January 18, 2018
Which Patients Require Physician-Led Inter-Hospital Transport in View of Endovascular Therapy?
Franck Leibinger1, Denis Sablot2,3, Laurène Van Damme4
1Intensive Care Unit, St. Jean Hospital, Perpignan, France.
Insights
Physician-led transfers are crucial for acute ischemic stroke patients with basilar artery occlusion, high NIHSS scores, or atrial fibrillation. Other patients may not require physician presence during inter-hospital transport.
Area of Science:
- Neurology
- Emergency Medicine
- Public Health
Background:
- Stroke networks are vital for organizing endovascular treatment (ET) for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO).
- Physician-led mobile medical teams conduct inter-hospital transfers from Primary Stroke Centres (PSCs) to Comprehensive Stroke Centres (CSCs).
- Increasing ET indications necessitate evaluating the critical availability of these physician-led transfer teams.
Purpose of the Study:
- To identify predictive factors for major complications (MC) during inter-hospital transfer of AIS patients.
- To determine which patients absolutely require physician presence during transport from PSC to CSC for potential ET.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective, single-centre observational study of 253 patients transferred for ET between 2015-2018.
- Patients with LVO transferred from Perpignan to a distant CSC were analyzed.
- Comparison between a Major Complication (MC) group and a non-MC group based on need for emergency intervention during transfer.
Main Results:
- 11.4% of transferred patients experienced major complications (MC).
- Multivariate analysis identified basilar artery (BA) occlusion, NIHSS score >22, and atrial fibrillation history as predictors of MC.
- Intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) during transfer was associated with a very low MC rate (0.6%).
Conclusions:
- Physician-led inter-hospital transport is recommended for patients with BA occlusion, NIHSS >22, or atrial fibrillation history.
- Transfer without a physician may be considered for patients without these risk factors, including those treated with IVT.
- This finding can help optimize the allocation of critical physician-led mobile medical team resources.
Introduction:
The current guidelines advocate the implementation of stroke networks to organize endovascular treatment (ET) for patients with acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion (LVO) after transfer from a Primary Stroke Centre (PSC) to a Comprehensive Stroke Centre (CSC). In France and in many other countries around the world, these transfers are carried out by a physician-led mobile medical team. However, with the recent broadening of ET indications, their availability is becoming more and more critical. Here, we retrospectively analysed data of patients transferred from a PSC to a CSC for potential ET to identify predictive factors of major complications (MC) at departure and during transport that absolutely require the presence of a physician during interhospital transfer.
Methods:
This observational, single-centre study included patients with evidence of intracranial LVO transferred for ET from Perpignan to a 156 km-distant CSC between January 1, 2015 and -December 31, 2018. We compared 2 groups: MC group (patients who required emergency intervention by the medical team due to life-threatening complications, including need of mechanical ventilation at departure) and non-MC group (all other patients who experienced no or only minor complications that could be managed by the emergency paramedics alone).
Results:
Among the 253 patients who were transferred to the CSC, 185 (73.1%) had no complication, 57 (22.6%) minor complications, and 11 (4.3%) had MC. In multivariate analysis, MC was associated with basilar artery (BA) occlusion (p < 0.0001), initial National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score >22 (p < 0.005), and history of atrial fibrillation (p < 0.04). Among the 168 patients treated with intravenous thrombolysis (IVT), only 1 patient (0.6%) had MC due to an IVT-related adverse event during transfer.
Conclusions:
Physician-led inter-hospital transports are warranted for patients with BA occlusion, initial NIHSS score >22, or history of atrial fibrillation. For the other patients, transfer without a physician may be considered, even if treated with IVT.
More Related Videos
06:59Catheter-based Endovascular Angioplasty for Fibrosing Mediastinitis-associated Pulmonary Vein Stenosis
Published on: August 26, 2025
13:48Reduction of Radiation Exposure during Endovascular Treatment of Peripheral Arterial Disease Combining Fiber Optic RealShape Technology and Intravascular Ultrasound
Published on: April 21, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
Aneurysm IV: Nursing Management
Pulmonary Embolism II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care