Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 3, 2026
A Postoperative Evaluation Guideline for Computer-Assisted Reconstruction of the Mandible
Published on: January 28, 2020
Quantitative assessment of condyle positional changes before and after orthognathic surgery based on fused 3D images
Ruo-Han Ma1, Gang Li2, Shuang Yin3
1Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, 22 Zhongguancun Nandajie, Haidian District, Beijing, 100081, China.
Objectives:
To establish one method that can be used to quantitatively evaluate the condyle positional changes with 3D images in postoperative mandibular prognathism patients.
Materials And Methods:
This is a retrospective observational study. Twenty-one patients who underwent bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy (BSSRO) were scanned with cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) for temporomandibular joints (TMJs) at 1 week preoperatively (T0), 1 to 2 weeks (T1), 3 months (T2), 6 months (T3), and 12 months (T4) postoperatively. The data were then grouped into T0T1, T1T2, T2T3, T3T4 and T0T1, T0T2, T0T3, and T0T4. Semi-automatic registration was conducted, and the condyle positional changes were measured in segmented 3D models. Inter- and intra-observer variability and the repeatability of registration were analyzed with paired t test; the repeated measurement analysis of variance was used for analyzing the repeatability of the marked points; the consistency of segmentation was analyzed with nonparametric test of multiple paired samples (Friedman test) and the independent-sample t test was applied to comparing changes between different periods of time. Differences were considered to be statistically significant when P < 0.05.
Results:
In T0T1 and T1T2, the condylar position was changed greatly. In T2T3, the mean condylar translations were less than 0.2 mm in all directions, the mean rotational changes of condyle were less than 0.2 mm; in the period of T3T4, the mean condylar translations in all directions were less than 0.02 mm. For series 2, the condyle translational changes in axial, coronal, and sagittal views were within 0.10 mm, and the rotation direction of condyle in all three views was the same within 1 year after operation.
Conclusions:
Fused three-dimensional images can be used to qualitatively and quantitatively evaluate condyle positional changes. The condylar position might be stable at 3 months postoperatively. The condyles of most of patients did not fully return to their preoperative position within 1 year after the operation.
Clinical Relevance:
One method for fusing images has been established to detect the condylar positional changes. This method may be applied to estimate the bony changes of condyle, even bony changes in other part of dentomaxillofacial region. Meanwhile, the data of condyle positional changes from asymptomatic patients after the surgery within 1 year can be used as a reference for further exploration of the relationship between orthognathic surgery and the occurrence of osteoarthritis postoperatively in the future.
Key Points:
• By fused 3D images, the change of condylar position after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy can be observed intuitively. • For the patients with mandibular prognathism, the condylar position would be stable at 3 months postoperatively. • The condyles of most mandibular prognathism patients did not fully return to their preoperative position within 1 year after operation.
