Development and Characterization of a Wee1 Kinase Degrader

Zhengnian Li1, Benika J Pinch2, Calla M Olson1

  • 1Department of Cancer Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Biological Chemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

Cell Chemical Biology
|November 19, 2019
PubMed

Insights

New Wee1 degraders, ZNL-02-096, offer a targeted approach to cancer therapy by degrading Wee1 while sparing PLK1. This novel strategy shows promise in overcoming limitations of existing Wee1 inhibitors, potentially reducing adverse events.

Area of Science:

  • Oncology
  • Molecular Biology
  • Drug Discovery

Background:

  • The G1/S cell cycle checkpoint is often dysregulated in cancer, increasing reliance on the G2/M checkpoint.
  • Wee1 kinase is a critical regulator of the G2/M checkpoint, preventing mitotic entry by phosphorylating CDK1 at Tyr15.
  • Existing Wee1 inhibitors like AZD1775 have limitations, including dose-limiting adverse events and off-target PLK1 activity.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop novel Wee1 degraders to overcome the limitations of current Wee1 inhibitors.
  • To investigate the efficacy and mechanism of a new Wee1 degrader, ZNL-02-096, in cancer cells.

Main Methods:

  • Conjugation of AZD1775 to pomalidomide to create cereblon (CRBN)-binding Wee1 degraders.
  • Evaluation of the lead compound ZNL-02-096 for Wee1 degradation, PLK1 sparing, and G2/M accumulation.
  • Assessment of ZNL-02-096 synergy with Olaparib in ovarian cancer cells.

Main Results:

  • The lead compound ZNL-02-096 effectively degrades Wee1 while sparing PLK1.
  • ZNL-02-096 induces G2/M cell cycle accumulation at 10-fold lower doses compared to AZD1775.
  • ZNL-02-096 demonstrates synergistic effects with Olaparib in ovarian cancer cells.
  • The pharmacology of ZNL-02-096 is CRBN-dependent and distinct from AZD1775.

Conclusions:

  • Selective Wee1 degraders, such as ZNL-02-096, represent a promising therapeutic strategy.
  • These novel degraders offer potential advantages over traditional Wee1 inhibitors by reducing off-target effects and improving efficacy.
  • Further evaluation of CRBN-dependent Wee1 degraders is warranted for cancer treatment.