Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Protein Organization01:24

Protein Organization

8.9K
Proteins are polymers of amino acid residues. They are versatile and responsible for different cellular functions, including DNA replication, molecular transport, catalysis, and structural support. Proteins have a hierarchical structure comprising at least three levels of organization: primary, secondary, and tertiary structure. Some large proteins have a quaternary structure where individual protein subunits are linked together.
The primary structure of a protein is its amino acid sequence....
8.9K
Protein Organization01:13

Protein Organization

155.4K
Overview
155.4K
Protein Folding01:22

Protein Folding

125.7K
Overview
125.7K
Protein Folding01:25

Protein Folding

10.8K
Proteins are chains of amino acids linked together by peptide bonds. Upon synthesis, a protein folds into a three-dimensional conformation, critical to its biological function. Interactions between its constituent amino acids guide protein folding, and hence the protein structure is primarily dependent on its amino acid sequence.
Protein Structure Is Critical to Its Biological Function
Proteins perform a wide range of biological functions such as catalyzing chemical reactions, providing...
10.8K
Protein and Protein Structures02:15

Protein and Protein Structures

18.1K
18.1K
Molecular Models02:00

Molecular Models

43.3K
Physical models representing molecular architectures of chemical compounds play essential roles in understanding chemistry. The use of molecular models makes it easier to visualize the structures and shapes of atoms and molecules.
43.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Mitigating Excessive Mitochondrial Fission Through the Development of a Selective Macrocyclic Inhibitor Targeting Fis1/Mid51 Signaling.

Journal of medicinal chemistry·2026
Same author

Inhibiting MARCH5/Mfn2 signaling as an alternative strategy to protect cardiomyocytes from hypoxia-induced mitochondrial dysfunction.

Computational and structural biotechnology journal·2025
Same author

Studying Biomolecular Protein Complexes via Origami and 3D-Printed Models.

International journal of molecular sciences·2024
Same author

Author Correction: A selective inhibitor of mitofusin 1-βIIPKC association improves heart failure outcome in rats.

Nature communications·2024
Same author

[EVALUATION OF DIFFERENT TIMINGS OF EARLY CARDIAC REHABILITATION AFTER MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION AND EXAMINATION OF DRUG THERAPY BASED ON THE SYNTHESIZED PEPTIDE TO BALANCE THE MITOCHONDRIAL DYNAMICS PROCESSES].

Harefuah·2024
Same author

The Potential Use of Peptides in the Fight against Chagas Disease and Leishmaniasis.

Pharmaceutics·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 3, 2026

Protein WISDOM: A Workbench for In silico De novo Design of BioMolecules
10:58

Protein WISDOM: A Workbench for In silico De novo Design of BioMolecules

Published on: July 25, 2013

17.5K

Approach for comparing protein structures and origami models.

Hay Azulay1, Aviv Lutaty2, Nir Qvit3

  • 1Koranit 2018100, Israel.

Biochimica Et Biophysica Acta. Biomembranes
|November 19, 2019
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study compares protein structures to origami models, finding similarities with the Kresling model. This analogy reveals insights into protein structure and design, particularly for transmembrane barrels.

Keywords:
Kresling modelOrigamiProteinStructureYoshimura modelα-Helical barrelβ-Barrel

More Related Videos

Application of I TASSER, trRosetta, UCSF Chimera, HADDOCK server, and HEX loria for De Novo and In Silico Design of Proteins
05:08

Application of I TASSER, trRosetta, UCSF Chimera, HADDOCK server, and HEX loria for De Novo and In Silico Design of Proteins

Published on: July 8, 2025

866
A Protocol for Computer-Based Protein Structure and Function Prediction
16:41

A Protocol for Computer-Based Protein Structure and Function Prediction

Published on: November 3, 2011

69.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 3, 2026

Protein WISDOM: A Workbench for In silico De novo Design of BioMolecules
10:58

Protein WISDOM: A Workbench for In silico De novo Design of BioMolecules

Published on: July 25, 2013

17.5K
Application of I TASSER, trRosetta, UCSF Chimera, HADDOCK server, and HEX loria for De Novo and In Silico Design of Proteins
05:08

Application of I TASSER, trRosetta, UCSF Chimera, HADDOCK server, and HEX loria for De Novo and In Silico Design of Proteins

Published on: July 8, 2025

866
A Protocol for Computer-Based Protein Structure and Function Prediction
16:41

A Protocol for Computer-Based Protein Structure and Function Prediction

Published on: November 3, 2011

69.6K

Area of Science:

  • Biophysics
  • Structural Biology
  • Computational Biology

Background:

  • The intersection of protein research and origami principles is emerging, particularly in protein folding and de novo design.
  • Existing knowledge on the structural analogies between proteins and origami models remains limited.
  • Understanding these analogies can offer novel perspectives on protein structure-function relationships.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose a general methodology for comparing protein structures with origami models.
  • To investigate the structural similarities between transmembrane β-barrels and α-helical barrels and specific origami models (Yoshimura and Kresling).
  • To explore the functional implications of these structural analogies for protein adaptation and design.

Main Methods:

  • Development of a general approach for comparing protein structures and origami models.
  • Application of the approach to compare transmembrane β-barrels and α-helical barrels with Yoshimura and Kresling origami models.
  • Analysis of structural characteristics, including shape, flexibility, and the role of stabilizing interactions (e.g., hydrogen bonds).

Main Results:

  • Both β-barrels and α-helical barrels exhibit shape and structural agreement primarily with the Kresling origami model.
  • The Kresling model analogy explains how these protein structures can adjust length and diameter in response to membrane environment changes.
  • While α-helical barrels show conformational adaptability, β-barrels are structurally rigid due to inter-strand hydrogen bonds, despite resembling the Kresling model.

Conclusions:

  • Similar structural patterns exist between protein structures and origami models.
  • The proposed comparative approach provides valuable insights into the functional roles of protein structures.
  • This methodology can guide the design of novel proteins with specific, desired characteristics.