Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 3, 2026

Watershed Planning within a Quantitative Scenario Analysis Framework
Published on: July 24, 2016
Nature-based solutions for hydro-meteorological hazards: Revised concepts, classification schemes and databases.
Sisay E Debele1, Prashant Kumar2, Jeetendra Sahani1
1Global Centre for Clean Air Research (GCARE), Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Faculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford GU2 7XH, United Kingdom.
Nature-based solutions (NBS) can mitigate hydro-meteorological hazards (HMHs) like floods and droughts in Europe. This review analyzes NBS effectiveness, identifies data gaps, and proposes strategies for wider adoption to reduce climate change impacts.
Area of Science:
- Environmental Science
- Climate Change Adaptation
- Ecosystem Management
Background:
- Hydro-meteorological hazards (HMHs) pose significant risks to societies and ecosystems, risks projected to intensify under future climate scenarios.
- Effective cataloguing of HMHs is crucial for risk assessment and remediation, but uncertainties in hazard origins and triggers present challenges.
- Nature-based solutions (NBS) offer a promising approach to mitigate HMHs, yet their widespread implementation is hindered by various factors.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze and present a classification scheme, key features, and design elements for nature-based solutions (NBS) to mitigate hydro-meteorological hazards (HMHs) in Europe.
- To systematically review the literature on NBS classification and assess barriers to their widespread adoption.
- To critically evaluate HMH drivers, their interrelationships (multi-hazards), and the effectiveness of NBS in diverse environmental contexts.
Main Methods:
- Systematic literature review focusing on NBS classification and hydro-meteorological hazards (HMHs) in Europe.
- Critical evaluation of existing literature on HMH drivers, multi-hazard interactions, and NBS effectiveness.
- Assessment of data availability for HMHs and NBS, identifying gaps and proposing strategies for improvement.
Main Results:
- A conceptual framework for classifying NBS in the context of HMHs was developed, highlighting the context-dependency of NBS effectiveness (location, species, environmental conditions).
- Nature-based solutions (NBS) are often more cost-effective than traditional hard engineering, especially considering co-benefits.
- Significant gaps and barriers exist in the uptake and upscaling of NBS for HMHs reduction, particularly concerning data availability and implementation studies.
Conclusions:
- Further research and conceptualization are needed to fully leverage NBS for HMH mitigation in Europe.
- Addressing data gaps and implementation barriers is essential for the wider adoption and upscaling of NBS.
- The review provides fundamental concepts and technical features to guide practitioners in designing and implementing NBS for real-world HMH management.
Related Concept Videos
Design Example: Analyzing Capacity Contours for Flood Risk Assessment
Applications of GIS: Disaster Management and Emergency Response
Precipitation Processes
Responses to Drought and Flooding
Precipitation and Co-precipitation
What is Weather?

