Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Conservation of Protein Domains Over Different Proteins

Conservation of Protein Domains Over Different Proteins

Protein domains are small structurally independent units that are part of a single amino acid chain. Although these domains are often structurally independent, they may rely on synergistic effects to perform their functions as part of a larger protein. Protein domains may be conserved within the same organism, as well as across different organisms.
A limited set of protein domains often duplicate and recombine during evolution. These domains can be organized in different combinations to...

Conserved Binding Sites

Conserved Binding Sites

Many proteins’ biological role depends on their interactions with their ligands, small molecules that bind to specific locations on the protein known as ligand-binding sites. Ligand-binding sites are often conserved among homologous proteins as these sites are critical for protein function.
Binding sites are often located in large pockets, and if their location on a protein’s surface is unknown, it can be predicted using various approaches. The energetic method computationally...

Conservation of Protein Domains

Conservation of Protein Domains

Ligand Binding and Linkage

Ligand Binding and Linkage

Allosteric proteins have more than one ligand binding site; the binding of a ligand to any of these sites influences the binding of ligands to the other sites. When a protein is allosteric, its binding sites are called coupled or linked. In the case of enzymes, the site that binds to the substrate is known as the active site and the other site is known as the regulatory site. When a ligand binds to the regulatory site, this leads to conformational changes in the protein that can influence...

Gene Evolution - Fast or Slow?

Gene Evolution - Fast or Slow?

The genomes of eukaryotes are punctuated by long stretches of sequence which do not code for proteins or RNAs. Although some of these regions do contain crucial regulatory sequences, the vast majority of this DNA serves no known function. Typically, these regions of the genome are the ones in which the fastest change, in evolutionary terms, is observed, because there is typically little to no selection pressure acting on these regions to preserve their sequences.
In contrast, regions which code...

Gene Evolution - Fast or Slow?

Gene Evolution - Fast or Slow?

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Engineering Biosensors to Enhance Monoterpene Indole Alkaloid Production in Yeast.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026

Same author

Unveiling Specificity, Redundancy, and Promiscuity of Five <i>Saccharomyces cerevisiae</i> Mitochondrial Carriers.

International journal of molecular sciences·2026

Same author

Labels as a feature: Network homophily for systematically annotating human GPCR drug-target interactions.

Nature communications·2025

Same author

The SPFH complex HflK-HflC regulates aerobic respiration in bacteria.

PLoS biology·2025

Same author

Metabolic Fluxes Using Deep Learning Based on Enzyme Variations: <i>Application to Glycolysis in Entamoeba histolytica</i>.

International journal of molecular sciences·2025

Same author

Metabolic mutations reduce antibiotic susceptibility of E. coli by pathway-specific bottlenecks.

Molecular systems biology·2025

Same journal

Plant uricase are evolutionarily conserved but functionally divergent: A case study of Oryza coarctata uricase.

Biochimica et biophysica acta. Proteins and proteomics·2026

Same journal

Structure of the short-form ATP-phosphoribosyltransferase from Acinetobacter baumannii reveals the presence of a novel Mg<sup>2+</sup> sequestering and storage site.

Biochimica et biophysica acta. Proteins and proteomics·2026

Same journal

Gaussia luciferase: A highly unusual enzyme.

Biochimica et biophysica acta. Proteins and proteomics·2026

Same journal

Co-eluting post-translational modification isoforms in collagen reveal fundamental challenge of LC-MS/MS site-specific analysis.

Biochimica et biophysica acta. Proteins and proteomics·2026

Same journal

A bond-aware graph neural network integrated with docking, pharmacophore modeling and molecular dynamics for JAK2 inhibitors affinity prediction.

Biochimica et biophysica acta. Proteins and proteomics·2026

Same journal

Structure-guided engineering of serratiopeptidase using constant-pH molecular dynamics and site-directed mutagenesis to improve pH-dependent functional resilience.

Biochimica et biophysica acta. Proteins and proteomics·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 3, 2026

Directed Evolution Method in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: Mutant Library Creation and Screening

Directed Evolution Method in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: Mutant Library Creation and Screening

Published on: April 1, 2016

Unbiased libraries in protein directed evolution.

Victor Sayous¹, Paul Lubrano², Yanyan Li¹

¹Unité Molécules de Communication et Adaptation des Microorganismes (MCAM), Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle (MNHN), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Paris, France.

Biochimica Et Biophysica Acta. Proteins and Proteomics

|November 20, 2019

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Directed evolution uses mutagenesis to engineer proteins. This review highlights methods like NNK, 22c-trick, and small-intelligent for creating less biased protein libraries, crucial for biotechnology and synthetic chemistry.

More Related Videos

Mutagenesis and Functional Selection Protocols for Directed Evolution of Proteins in E. coli

Mutagenesis and Functional Selection Protocols for Directed Evolution of Proteins in E. coli

Published on: March 16, 2011

In Vitro Directed Evolution of a Restriction Endonuclease with More Stringent Specificity

In Vitro Directed Evolution of a Restriction Endonuclease with More Stringent Specificity

Published on: March 25, 2020

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 3, 2026

Directed Evolution Method in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: Mutant Library Creation and Screening

Directed Evolution Method in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: Mutant Library Creation and Screening

Published on: April 1, 2016

Mutagenesis and Functional Selection Protocols for Directed Evolution of Proteins in E. coli

Mutagenesis and Functional Selection Protocols for Directed Evolution of Proteins in E. coli

Published on: March 16, 2011

In Vitro Directed Evolution of a Restriction Endonuclease with More Stringent Specificity

In Vitro Directed Evolution of a Restriction Endonuclease with More Stringent Specificity

Published on: March 25, 2020

Area of Science:

Protein engineering
Molecular biology
Biotechnology

Background:

Directed evolution is a key strategy for understanding protein evolution and engineering proteins.
Mutagenesis methods, including random and focused approaches, are used to modify protein traits.
Focused mutagenesis, like site-directed and saturation mutagenesis, is preferred for its manageable screening process.

Purpose of the Study:

To review methods for creating less biased and unbiased protein libraries.
To assess the applications of primer-based 22c-trick and small-intelligent mutagenesis.
To discuss the advantages and disadvantages of these focused mutagenesis techniques.

Main Methods:

Review of studies utilizing 22c-trick and small-intelligent mutagenesis for library creation.
Comparison of traditional PCR-based methods with newer library construction techniques.
Analysis of NNK mutagenesis as a common focused mutagenesis approach.

Main Results:

Novel methods like 22c-trick and small-intelligent offer alternatives to traditional NNK mutagenesis for unbiased library creation.
These methods are valuable when all 20 canonical amino acids are required for protein engineering.
PCR-based approaches, despite imperfections, remain prevalent due to cost and simplicity.

Conclusions:

Focused mutagenesis methods are critical for advancing protein engineering.
The 22c-trick and small-intelligent methods provide powerful tools for generating diverse and less biased protein libraries.
Future directions involve creating even smarter libraries for enhanced protein design.