Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 3, 2026
An Improved Mechanical Testing Method to Assess Bone-implant Anchorage
Published on: February 10, 2014
Bone-implant-contact and new bone formation around implants placed in FDB blocks compared to placement at the
Karen Anavi Lev1, Liat Chaushu1, Frank Schwarz2
1Department of Periodontology and Oral Implantology, School of Dental Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Background:
The efficacy of human freeze-dried bone (h-FDB) as particulate vs block forms as a proper onlay augmented bone graft material to accommodate implants is undetermined.
Purpose:
To evaluate osseointegration and new bone formation at implants placed in FDB blocks (BL group) and those at the adjunction of particulate FDB (PR group).
Materials And Methods:
Twelve pairs of h-FDB blocks were stabilized bilaterally to the calvaria of 12 rabbits. Twenty-four SLA implants were placed at the remodeled grafted blocks, 4 months later. A circumferential gap was created around one implant in each pair and packed with particulate h-FDB. Section biopsies were obtained at 2-month post implant placement (6 months post-block grafting). Bone-to-implant contact (BIC) and bone-area fraction (BAF) were histomorphometrically calculated.
Results:
The mean BIC was 34.4% and 33.5% for the BL and PR groups, respectively. The mean BAF was 23.9% and 26.4% for the corresponding groups, respectively. Osseointegration and newly formed bone were evident mostly between the threaded portions of the implants in proximity to the host rabbit calvaria compared to its cervical neck.
Conclusion:
The particulate and the cancellous block h-FDB forms yielded similar BIC and BAF outcome. Full revascularization/revitalization is questioned.
