Defect evaluation by infant photographs in a multicenter pharmaceutical clinical trial
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 3, 2026

Defining the Role Of Language in Infants' Object Categorization with Eye-tracking Paradigms
Published on: February 8, 2019
Angela E Scheuerle1, Paul Kwon2, Mark Joing2
1Department of Pediatrics, Division of Genetics and Metabolism, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.
Insights
Standardized infant photography effectively identified congenital anomalies in a clinical trial, aiding birth defect detection. This pilot study demonstrated a successful method for enhanced dysmorphology assessment in infants.
Area of Science:
- Medical research
- Clinical trials
- Genetics
Background:
- The NT-04 clinical trial utilized investigational medication NT100.
- A geographically diverse but limited study population was enrolled.
- Enhanced methods were needed for birth defect identification.
Purpose of the Study:
- To implement and evaluate a photographic dysmorphology examination for infants.
- To improve the detection of congenital anomalies in a clinical trial setting.
- To supplement prenatal and postnatal medical record reviews.
Main Methods:
- Standardized photographic views of infants were developed and implemented.
- Professional photographers were recruited, trained, and utilized.
- Photos were taken within the first month of life and uploaded to a secure online viewer for geneticist evaluation.
Main Results:
- Thirty-eight pregnancy outcomes underwent photographic dysmorphology evaluation.
- Photographic assessments were successfully completed for most infants.
- Minor malformations were identified more uniformly through repeated photo review.
Conclusions:
- Standardized infant photography is a successful pilot method for detecting congenital anomalies.
- Advantages include consistent clinician evaluation and repeated photo review.
- Challenges involved photographer recruitment, training, and photo publication consent.
Object:
The NT-04 clinical trial of investigational medication NT100 had a limited, though geographically diverse, study population. To enhance potential birth defect identification, photographic dysmorphology exam of infants was performed along with review of prenatal and postnatal medical records.
Methods:
Standardized photographic views were developed: full body (prone and supine), face, both profiles, dorsal and ventral hands and feet, genitalia, and birthmarks/skin lesions. Professional photographers were identified and trained. Photos were taken in the first month of life at the subject's home and uploaded to a secure electronic online photo viewer. The evaluating geneticist accessed the photos electronically and submitted an evaluation.
Results:
Forty subjects had 39 evaluable outcomes (55 babies). Twelve photographers were recruited, 10 of whom worked with multiple subjects. Photographic dysmorphology evaluation was done on 38 pregnancy outcomes. Only one baby had missing photos due to an apparent protocol error. Four babies were photographed with diaper on.
Conclusions:
The standardized photographs worked well. Advantages include: a single clinician evaluating all infants, the photographs could be reviewed repeatedly as needed, and minor malformations were more uniformly identified. Difficulties were: identifying local photographers and supplying training and training materials. There was no protocol for retaking or obtaining new photos and the study consent form did not include permission to publish the photographs. This was a successful pilot study of infant photographic assessment to detect congenital anomalies in a clinical trial.
More Related Videos
05:10Author Spotlight: An Automated Method for Assessing Visual Acuity in Infants and Toddlers Using an Eye-Tracking System
Published on: March 17, 2023
11:14A Novel Experimental and Analytical Approach to the Multimodal Neural Decoding of Intent During Social Interaction in Freely-behaving Human Infants
Published on: October 4, 2015
Related Concept Videos
Clinical Trials: Overview
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...