Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 3, 2026

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care
Published on: February 16, 2011
Medicare Advantage plan representatives' perspectives on Pay for Success
Emily A Gadbois1, Shayla Durfey, David J Meyers
1Brown University School of Public Health, 121 S Main St, Providence, RI 02912.
Medicare Advantage plan representatives are mostly unaware of Pay for Success (PFS) but interested in its potential to address social needs. Education and CMS guidance are needed to overcome concerns about this innovative funding model.
Area of Science:
- Health Services Research
- Health Policy
- Social Determinants of Health
Background:
- Medicare Advantage (MA) plans are increasingly focused on addressing members' social determinants of health.
- Alternative financing models like Pay for Success (PFS) offer potential solutions for funding these initiatives.
- Understanding MA plan representatives' perspectives on PFS is crucial for its successful implementation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To explore Medicare Advantage plan representatives' perceptions of the Pay for Success (PFS) financing model.
- To assess the potential of PFS to address social risk factors among MA members.
- To understand barriers and facilitators to implementing PFS within MA plans.
Main Methods:
- Qualitative study employing semistructured interviews with 38 upper-management representatives from 17 MA plans.
- Interviews focused on priorities for addressing nonmedical needs, awareness of PFS, and implementation considerations.
- Thematic analysis of interview transcripts to identify overarching themes and patterns.
Main Results:
- MA plan representatives generally lacked familiarity with PFS but expressed interest in its application to social needs.
- Responses regarding data sharing and performance evaluation varied, with some preferring internal processes.
- While innovation was a priority for many, some representatives favored traditional service delivery methods due to risk aversion.
Conclusions:
- MA plan representatives are largely unfamiliar with PFS but show interest in its potential for innovative social needs programming.
- Educational initiatives are needed to increase MA representatives' understanding of PFS as an alternative payment model.
- Further guidance from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) is necessary to address concerns and facilitate PFS adoption.
More Related Videos
06:05The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
Published on: February 19, 2021
14:43A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
Published on: January 12, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic...
Issues And Trends In Healthcare Delivery System
Cost Containment
Payment for healthcare services has historically promoted adoption of costly and often unnecessary or inefficient...
Introduction To Health Care Delivery System
The Institute of Medicine (IOM) advocates for a patient-centered, effective, safe, timely, equitable, and effective healthcare system. The National Priorities...
Health Information Technology and Healthcare Information System
Health Information Technology, commonly called HIT, integrates advanced information systems and technology in healthcare settings. Its primary functions include:
Patient-centered Care
Documentation in Long-Term and Home Healthcare Setting
Long-Term Care Facilities