Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Low sensitivity for orientation in texture similarity ratings.

Journal of vision·2024

Same author

Overt and covert visual search in primates: reaction times and gaze shift strategies.

Journal of integrative neuroscience·2009

Same author

Latency effects in orientation popout.

Vision research·2002

Same author

Neurons with radial receptive fields in monkey area V4A: evidence of a subdivision of prelunate gyrus based on neuronal response properties.

Experimental brain research·2002

Same author

Attention shifts to salient targets.

Vision research·2002

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 3, 2026

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking

Published on: August 29, 2018

Location-cued visual selection-Placeholder dots improve target identification.

Hans-Christoph Nothdurft¹

¹Visual Perception Laboratory (VPL) Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany.

Journal of Vision

|November 21, 2019

Summary

Visual cues guide attention, speeding up target identification shortly after presentation. Placeholder dots during delays significantly reduce performance decay, enhancing sustained attention.

More Related Videos

Development of a Gaze-Contingent Display Framework Designed for Perceptual and Oculomotor Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss

Development of a Gaze-Contingent Display Framework Designed for Perceptual and Oculomotor Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss

Published on: April 11, 2025

Methods to Test Visual Attention Online

Methods to Test Visual Attention Online

Published on: February 19, 2015

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 3, 2026

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking

Published on: August 29, 2018

Development of a Gaze-Contingent Display Framework Designed for Perceptual and Oculomotor Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss

Development of a Gaze-Contingent Display Framework Designed for Perceptual and Oculomotor Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss

Published on: April 11, 2025

Methods to Test Visual Attention Online

Methods to Test Visual Attention Online

Published on: February 19, 2015

Area of Science:

Cognitive Psychology
Neuroscience
Visual Perception

Background:

Visual cues are crucial for target selection and attentional guidance.
Previous research indicates transient cuing effects in visual detection tasks.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate the temporal dynamics of attention effects following a visual cue.
To examine the impact of placeholder stimuli on sustained attention and performance decay.

Main Methods:

A 50-millisecond (ms) exogenous cue was presented to guide attention towards one of 80 tilted lines.
Observer performance was measured by the time required to identify the target at various stimulus onset asynchronies (SOAs) up to 5 seconds.
The effect of placeholder dots at subsequent line positions versus a structured background was compared.

Main Results:

A transient cuing effect was observed, with faster target identification at delays between 50-300 ms.
Performance decayed significantly at longer delays, requiring increased presentation time for target identification.
Placeholder dots during the delay period substantially reduced this performance decay, unlike a simple structured background.

Conclusions:

Visual cues provide a transient attentional benefit, but performance degrades over time.
Placeholder stimuli during the delay phase can mitigate performance decline, suggesting a role in maintaining attentional focus.
Placeholder dots appear to enhance underlying neural responses to cued targets, with a transient peak around 100 ms post-cue onset.