Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 3, 2026

Standardized SDS-PAGE Workflow for Personalized Protein Corona Profiling in Early Cancer Detection
Published on: December 19, 2025
Can the CalproQuest predict a positive Calprotectin test? A prospective diagnostic study
Corinne Chmiel1, Oliver Senn1, Susann Hasler1
1Institute of Primary Care, University and University Hospital of Zurich, Switzerland.
The CalproQuest questionnaire showed poor accuracy in identifying inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in primary care, failing to reliably increase the pre-test probability for a positive fecal Calprotectin test. Further research is needed to assess its clinical utility.
Area of Science:
- Gastroenterology
- Primary Care Medicine
- Diagnostic Test Evaluation
Background:
- Diagnosing inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in primary care (PC) presents challenges and often leads to significant diagnostic delays.
- The fecal Calprotectin test is a valuable tool, but widespread use in PC for undifferentiated abdominal complaints is cost-prohibitive.
- The CalproQuest questionnaire was developed to identify patients with a higher pre-test probability for elevated fecal Calprotectin levels.
Purpose of the Study:
- To validate the effectiveness of the CalproQuest questionnaire in increasing the pre-test probability for a positive fecal Calprotectin test in a primary care setting.
- To assess the sensitivity and specificity of the CalproQuest for detecting elevated Calprotectin levels and confirming an IBD diagnosis.
- To evaluate the impact of the CalproQuest on patient-reported diagnostic delay.
Main Methods:
- A prospective diagnostic trial was conducted involving 156 patients across 7 study centers.
- Patients completed the 8-item CalproQuest questionnaire, which assesses IBD-suggestive symptoms.
- The primary outcome measured was the sensitivity and specificity of CalproQuest for fecal Calprotectin levels ≥ 50 μg/g and for a confirmed IBD diagnosis upon referral to secondary care.
Main Results:
- The CalproQuest demonstrated low sensitivity (36%) and specificity (57%) for detecting Calprotectin levels ≥ 50 μg/g.
- For predicting a positive IBD diagnosis, the CalproQuest showed a sensitivity of 37% and a specificity of 67%.
- The study observed a substantial patient-reported diagnostic delay, averaging 61 months.
Conclusions:
- The CalproQuest questionnaire exhibited poor performance in terms of sensitivity and specificity for both elevated Calprotectin levels and a confirmed IBD diagnosis in this primary care cohort.
- The findings suggest that the CalproQuest, as used in this study, is not a reliable tool for improving the pre-test probability of IBD in primary care.
- Further prospective research is warranted to determine optimal cut-off values, validate the questionnaire's utility, and assess its cost-effectiveness in conjunction with fecal Calprotectin testing within the primary care setting.
More Related Videos
06:16Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease
Published on: August 9, 2024
06:46Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
Published on: September 27, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value
Sensitivity is the...
Serum Laboratory Studies, Stool Test, Breath Test
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System VI: Calcium -Scoring CT
P-value
P-value stands for the probability value. P-value is the probability that, if the null hypothesis is true, the results from another randomly selected sample will be as extreme or more extreme as the results obtained from the given sample.
A large P-value calculated from the data indicates to not reject the null hypothesis. But a higher P-value does not mean that the null hypothesis is true. The smaller the P-value, the more...