Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Impact of Groups on Groups01:19

Impact of Groups on Groups

204
Social psychologists analyze how groups influence one another, shaping social structures and interactions through both cooperation and competition. These dynamics manifest in various ways, ranging from economic partnerships to intergroup conflicts that shape societal structures and perceptions.Cooperation and Competition in Intergroup RelationsIntergroup relationships vary across contexts, sometimes fostering cooperation and mutual benefit while at other times leading to conflict and...
204
Decision Making01:20

Decision Making

842
Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
842
Social Psychology and Individual Behavior01:29

Social Psychology and Individual Behavior

233
Social psychology examines how group dynamics, emotions, and cultural influences shape individual actions and decision-making. These elements interact to form behavioral patterns that affect personal choices and social interactions.The Role of Group DynamicsGroups play a crucial role in shaping behavior by reinforcing norms and expectations. Individuals derive a sense of self from group membership, often aligning their behaviors with group norms to maintain social cohesion. For example, an...
233
Automatic Processing and Automatic Social Behavior01:28

Automatic Processing and Automatic Social Behavior

188
Automatic processing refers to the cognitive operations that occur without conscious intent or awareness, playing a fundamental role in shaping social cognition and behavior. These processes enable individuals to navigate complex social environments efficiently by relying on mental shortcuts and pre-existing knowledge structures known as schemas. One of the most influential mechanisms underlying automatic processing is priming, which subtly activates mental representations through exposure to...
188
Decision Making: Traditional Method01:14

Decision Making: Traditional Method

5.0K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
5.0K
Causes of Social Behavior II: Cognitive Processes01:15

Causes of Social Behavior II: Cognitive Processes

168
Cognitive processes affect social behavior by guiding how individuals perceive, interpret, and respond to social stimuli. These mental processes enable individuals to assess others' behaviors, attribute causes to their actions, and form expectations based on past experiences.Causes of Behavior and Social JudgmentsIndividuals determine the causes of others' behaviors by distinguishing between personal traits and external circumstances. For example, if a friend frequently arrives late, an...
168

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Social learning dynamically shapes moral decision-making by biasing subjective valuation.

PLoS biology·2026
Same author

Oxytocin modulates the neurocomputational mechanisms engaged in learning rank relationships in social networks.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same author

Learning to adaptively cooperate through social interactions during childhood and adolescence.

NPJ science of learning·2026
Same author

Intention-Outcome Trade-Off in Moral Character Learning.

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences·2026
Same author

Neurocomputational mechanisms of adaptive mentalization in humans.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026
Same author

Off task map-making: Give it a rest!

Neuron·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 3, 2026

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

9.7K

Neural computations underlying strategic social decision-making in groups.

Seongmin A Park1,2, Mariateresa Sestito3, Erie D Boorman4

  • 1Neuroeconomics laboratory, Institut des Sciences Cognitives Marc Jeannerod, CNRS UMR 5229, 69675, Lyon, France. seongmin.a.park@gmail.com.

Nature Communications
|November 23, 2019
PubMed
Summary

Group decisions involve balancing individual and group rewards. The ventromedial prefrontal cortex tracks individual gains, while the frontopolar cortex tracks group benefits, revealing brain mechanisms for adaptive collective decision-making.

More Related Videos

An Automated T-maze Based Apparatus and Protocol for Analyzing Delay- and Effort-based Decision Making in Free Moving Rodents
07:42

An Automated T-maze Based Apparatus and Protocol for Analyzing Delay- and Effort-based Decision Making in Free Moving Rodents

Published on: August 2, 2018

14.3K
Measuring Neural and Behavioral Activity During Ongoing Computerized Social Interactions: An Examination of Event-Related Brain Potentials
09:40

Measuring Neural and Behavioral Activity During Ongoing Computerized Social Interactions: An Examination of Event-Related Brain Potentials

Published on: November 15, 2014

14.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 3, 2026

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
06:48

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior

Published on: January 19, 2019

9.7K
An Automated T-maze Based Apparatus and Protocol for Analyzing Delay- and Effort-based Decision Making in Free Moving Rodents
07:42

An Automated T-maze Based Apparatus and Protocol for Analyzing Delay- and Effort-based Decision Making in Free Moving Rodents

Published on: August 2, 2018

14.3K
Measuring Neural and Behavioral Activity During Ongoing Computerized Social Interactions: An Examination of Event-Related Brain Potentials
09:40

Measuring Neural and Behavioral Activity During Ongoing Computerized Social Interactions: An Examination of Event-Related Brain Potentials

Published on: November 15, 2014

14.5K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Cognitive Science
  • Social Decision-Making

Background:

  • Group decision-making involves complex trade-offs between individual and collective incentives.
  • Understanding the neurocomputational basis of these decisions, especially in repeated social interactions, remains a challenge.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the neural mechanisms underlying the computation of individual versus group utility during social decision-making.
  • To identify brain regions involved in updating beliefs and adapting strategies in group contexts.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized model-based functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI).
  • Employed Public-good-games to simulate repeated social interactions and decision-making scenarios.

Main Results:

  • The ventromedial prefrontal cortex was found to encode immediate individual expected rewards.
  • The lateral frontopolar cortex was identified as encoding group utility, representing potential benefits for the group.
  • Functional interactions between these regions and strategy-switching areas changed when strategy adaptation was required.
  • The anterior cingulate cortex and temporoparietal junction were involved in updating beliefs about others' decisions.

Conclusions:

  • The study provides a neurocomputational framework for understanding adaptive collective decision-making.
  • Specific brain regions dynamically compute individual and group utilities, facilitating strategic adaptation in social contexts.