Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 3, 2026

Hydra, a Computer-Based Platform for Aiding Clinicians in Cardiovascular Analysis and Diagnosis
Published on: September 26, 2018
Comparison of Cardiovascular Risk Factors and Outcomes Among Practicing Physicians vs the General Population in
Dennis T Ko1,2,3, Anna Chu1, Peter C Austin1
1ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Insights
Physicians have better cardiovascular health and fewer risk factors than the general population. This study found physicians experienced 22% fewer major adverse cardiovascular outcomes, despite less preventive screening.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Public Health
- Epidemiology
Background:
- Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is a leading cause of mortality globally.
- Physicians' personal cardiovascular health and outcomes are not well-understood.
- Understanding physician health is crucial for the healthcare system.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the burden of cardiac risk factors between physicians and the general population.
- To assess differences in health services utilization for cardiovascular care.
- To determine the incidence of major cardiovascular events in physicians versus the general population.
Main Methods:
- A cohort study in Ontario, Canada, comparing practicing physicians (n=17,071) with nonphysicians (n=5,306,038).
- Participants aged 40-75 years without prior CVD, followed from 2008 to 2015.
- Primary outcome: 8-year incidence of major cardiovascular events (e.g., MI, stroke, CVD death).
Main Results:
- Physicians exhibited lower rates of hypertension, diabetes, and smoking, with better cholesterol profiles.
- Physicians had lower utilization of periodic health examinations and screening tests for hyperlipidemia and diabetes.
- The incidence of major cardiovascular events was 4.4 per 1000 person-years for physicians vs. 7.1 for the general population.
- Physicians had a 22% lower hazard of major adverse cardiovascular outcomes after adjustment.
Conclusions:
- Practicing physicians in Ontario demonstrate superior cardiovascular risk factor profiles compared to the general population.
- Despite lower preventive screening rates, physicians experienced significantly fewer major adverse cardiovascular outcomes.
- These findings highlight the complex interplay between lifestyle, healthcare access, and cardiovascular health in physicians.
Importance:
Although cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death in most developed countries, little is known about current physicians' cardiovascular health and outcomes.
Objective:
To compare cardiac risk factor burden, health services use, and major cardiovascular event incidence between physicians and the general population.
Design, Setting, And Participants:
This cohort study used data from practicing physicians and nonphysicians without cardiovascular disease aged 40 to 75 years in Ontario, Canada. Cohorts were assembled beginning January 1, 2008, and were followed up to December 31, 2015. Data analysis was performed between November 2017 and September 2019.
Exposure:
Being a practicing physician.
Main Outcomes And Measures:
The primary outcome was 8-year incidence of a major cardiovascular event (ie, cardiovascular death or hospitalization for myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure, or coronary revascularization). Secondary outcomes included health services used, such as physician assessments and guideline-recommended tests.
Results:
The cohort comprised 17 071 physicians (mean [SD] age, 53.3 [8.8] years; 11 963 [70.1%] men) and 5 306 038 nonphysicians (mean [SD] age, 53.7 [9.5] years; 2 556 044 [48.2%] men). Physicians had significantly lower baseline rates of hypertension (16.9% vs 29.6%), diabetes (5.0% vs 11.3%), and smoking (13.1% vs 21.6%), while having better cholesterol profiles (total cholesterol levels >240 mg/dL, 13.3% vs 16.5%; low-density lipoprotein cholesterol >130 mg/dL, 33.2% vs 36.8%); age- and sex-adjusted differences were even larger. Physicians also had lower rates of periodic health examinations (58.9% [95% CI, 57.5%-60.4%] vs 67.9% [95% CI, 67.8%-67.9%]), hyperlipidemia screening (76.3% [95% CI, 74.7%-78.0%] vs 83.8% [95% CI, 83.7%-83.9%]), and diabetes screening (79.0% [95% CI, 77.3%-80.8%] vs 85.3% [95% CI, 85.2%-85.4%]), but higher rates of cardiologist consultations (25.2% [95% CI, 24.2%-26.3%] vs 19.5% [95% CI, 19.4%-19.5%]). The 8-year age- and sex-standardized primary outcome incidence was 4.4 major cardiovascular events per 1000 person-years for physicians and 7.1 major cardiovascular events per 1000 person-years for the general population. After adjusting for age, sex, socioeconomic status, and cardiac risks and comorbidities, physicians had a 22% lower hazard (hazard ratio, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.72-0.85) of experiencing the primary outcome compared with the general population.
Conclusions And Relevance:
Practicing physicians in Ontario had fewer cardiovascular risk factors, underwent less preventive testing, and were less likely to experience major adverse cardiovascular outcomes than the general population.
More Related Videos
06:04Author Spotlight: Assessing the Cardiovascular Profile of Patients with Metabolic Syndrome
Published on: September 27, 2024
10:11Fundus Photography as a Convenient Tool to Study Microvascular Responses to Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors in Epidemiological Studies
Published on: October 22, 2014
Related Concept Videos
Coronary Artery Disease I: Introduction
Assessment of the Cardiovascular System I: Subjective Data
Initial Enquiry
Ask the patient about their primary concern and thoroughly explore all reported symptoms.
Medical History
Investigate past illnesses affecting the cardiovascular system, such as angina, anemia, rheumatic fever, congenital heart disease, stroke, thrombophlebitis, dysrhythmias, varicosities
Inquire about symptoms...
Relative Risk
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Coronary Artery Disease IV: Preventive Measures
Factors affecting Blood pressure
Physiological Factors: