Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 3, 2026

05:30
Soft Pneumatic Robot Modulates Graph Theory Metrics of Brain Network for Hand Rehabilitation After Stroke
Published on: October 10, 2025
353
A Taxonomy of Brain-Behavior Relationships After Stroke
Peter E Turkeltaub1,2,3
1Department of Neurology, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC.
Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research : JSLHR
|November 23, 2019
Summary
This review proposes a new framework to understand how brain features influence language and cognitive outcomes after stroke. It categorizes brain-stroke relationships to guide future research on aphasia.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Neurology
- Speech and Language Pathology
Background:
- Understanding brain mechanisms of language and cognition post-stroke is crucial for aphasia research.
- Existing studies often overlook the diverse brain-behavior relationships and underlying mechanisms in stroke recovery.
Purpose of the Study:
- To introduce a novel framework for analyzing brain features and their impact on language and cognitive outcomes following stroke.
- To organize brain-behavior relationships into a taxonomy for aphasia research.
Main Methods:
- A taxonomy categorizing brain-behavior relationships in aphasia.
- Classification of lesion features and spared brain tissue features (both static and dynamic).
- Discussion of neurobiological and behavioral mechanisms driving brain changes post-stroke.
Main Results:
- Stroke characteristics (size, location, white matter damage) significantly predict behavioral outcomes.
- Static features of spared brain tissue, like pre-existing white matter disease, also influence outcomes.
- Dynamic changes in the brain post-stroke are driven by diverse neurobiological and behavioral mechanisms.
Conclusions:
- The proposed framework aids in developing targeted experimental designs and statistical models for studying post-stroke language and cognition.
- Highlights the importance of considering both lesion and spared tissue characteristics, and their dynamic changes.
- Provides eight recommendations for future research directions in aphasia.

