Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

The Scientific Method in Nursing Process01:18

The Scientific Method in Nursing Process

15.4K
The scientific method provides the foundation for any research. It is the most reliable and objective of all forms of gaining knowledge and guides in applying research-based evidence in practice and conducting future research.
When using research findings to change practice, one must understand the process used to guide a study. The scientific method is a systematic, step-by-step process that supports the data's validity, reliability, and generalizability. As a result, findings can be...
15.4K
Guidelines for Writing Outcome01:11

Guidelines for Writing Outcome

3.6K
When developing expected outcomes for a patient care plan, the nurse should adhere to the following recommendations:
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care...
3.6K
Synthetic Biology02:55

Synthetic Biology

5.4K
Synthetic biology is an interdisciplinary science that involves using principles from disciplines such as engineering, molecular biology, cell biology, and systems biology. It involves remodeling existing organisms from nature or constructing completely new synthetic organisms for applications such as protein or enzyme production, bioremediation, value-added macromolecule production, and the addition of desirable traits to crops, to name a few.
Golden rice
Golden rice is a genetically modified...
5.4K
The Scientific Method01:32

The Scientific Method

255.1K
The scientific method is a detailed, empirical problem-solving process used by biologists and other scientists. This iterative approach involves formulating a question based on observation, developing a testable potential explanation for the observation (called a hypothesis), making and testing predictions based on the hypothesis, and using the findings to create new hypotheses and predictions.
Generally, predictions are tested using carefully-designed experiments. Based on the outcome of these...
255.1K
The Scientific Method02:40

The Scientific Method

64.6K
Research is what makes the difference between facts and opinions. Facts are observable realities, and opinions are personal judgments, conclusions, or attitudes that may or may not be accurate. In the scientific community, facts can be established only using evidence collected through empirical research.
64.6K
The Scientific Method03:50

The Scientific Method

64.1K
Chemistry is an empirical science. Scientists often pose questions to understand the chemistry in everyday life and seek answers to these questions. To achieve this, scientists follow a definitive series of steps that together make up the Scientific Method. This approach involves making observations, asking questions, building a hypothesis, conducting experiments, analyzing results, and forming a conclusion. 
64.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

In response to "Drawing maps in the fog: rethinking safety and system context in paramedic non-transport".

JBI evidence synthesis·2026
Same author

Values-driven evidence-based health care: concept analysis of core global values in implementation.

JBI evidence implementation·2026
Same author

Non-transport of patients following assessment and care by paramedics: a scoping review protocol.

JBI evidence synthesis·2026
Same author

The implementation gap in anterior cruciate ligament prevention programs-From evidence to everyday practice.

Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA·2025
Same author

Sampling methods and considerations in quality improvement: a scoping review.

JBI evidence implementation·2025
Same author

Assessing the Ethical Integrity of Quality Improvement Studies [AEGIS]: a mixed methods study.

JBI evidence implementation·2025
Same journal

Development and evaluation of an online maternal-fetal interaction promotion program using a photo diary.

Asian nursing research·2026
Same journal

Elder abuse and its associated factors in community settings in South Korea.

Asian nursing research·2026
Same journal

Decent work in nursing: A concept analysis.

Asian nursing research·2026
Same journal

The Human Value of Peer Review in Nursing.

Asian nursing research·2026
Same journal

INFORMATICS AND HEALTHCARE TECHNOLOGY COMPETENCY AMONG NURSES IN A LOW-RESOURCED COUNTRY: A MIXED-METHODS RESEARCH.

Asian nursing research·2026
Same journal

Unmet Needs of Patients with Parkinson's Disease and Their Caregivers During the Discharge Transition: A Qualitative Descriptive Study.

Asian nursing research·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 3, 2026

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
05:47

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems

Published on: June 13, 2025

1.2K

Practical Guidance for Knowledge Synthesis: Scoping Review Methods.

Craig Lockwood1, Kelli Borgess Dos Santos2, Robin Pap3

  • 1Implementation Science, The Joanna Briggs Institute, North Adelaide, Australia.

Asian Nursing Research
|November 23, 2019
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This guide clarifies scoping review methods, emphasizing pre-planning and clear reporting. Following best practices ensures high-quality, reliable, and publishable scoping reviews.

Keywords:
evidence-based practicemethodspublishing/standardsreview literature as topic

More Related Videos

Using SCOPE to Identify Potential Regulatory Motifs in Coregulated Genes
07:55

Using SCOPE to Identify Potential Regulatory Motifs in Coregulated Genes

Published on: May 31, 2011

10.7K
Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases
05:02

Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases

Published on: October 24, 2019

33.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 3, 2026

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
05:47

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems

Published on: June 13, 2025

1.2K
Using SCOPE to Identify Potential Regulatory Motifs in Coregulated Genes
07:55

Using SCOPE to Identify Potential Regulatory Motifs in Coregulated Genes

Published on: May 31, 2011

10.7K
Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases
05:02

Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases

Published on: October 24, 2019

33.4K

Area of Science:

  • Research Synthesis
  • Evidence-Based Practice

Background:

  • Scoping reviews synthesize research evidence but often face confusion regarding methods and reporting standards.
  • Distinguishing scoping reviews from systematic reviews is crucial for appropriate application.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide guidance on planning and preparing scoping reviews to meet international best practice standards.
  • To address common issues in scoping review methodology, including search strategies, transparency, and results presentation.
  • To enhance the clarity, reliability, and publishability of scoping reviews through effective pre-planning and innovative approaches.

Main Methods:

  • Utilizing available guidance to ensure adherence to global standards for scoping reviews.
  • Focusing on transparency in methods, data analysis, and presentation.
  • Addressing common methodological challenges and offering solutions for improved reporting.

Main Results:

  • Effective pre-planning and protocol adherence are critical for high-quality scoping reviews.
  • Innovative approaches to data analysis and presentation enhance readability and accessibility.
  • Clear communication of results ensures reviews are compelling and accessible to readers.

Conclusions:

  • Scoping reviews require careful planning and adherence to methodological standards for quality and reliability.
  • Transparency and innovative presentation methods improve the impact and publishability of scoping reviews.
  • This article offers clarity on conceptualization and pre-planning to produce high-standard scoping reviews.