Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 3, 2026

Author Spotlight: Advancements and Challenges in Surgical Treatments for Postamputation Pain
Published on: March 8, 2024
Reducing opioid usage: a pilot study comparing postoperative selective dorsal rhizotomy protocols
Ludovic P Pao1, Liang Zhu2, Sarah Tariq3
11Division of Pediatric Neurosurgery, Departments of Pediatric Surgery and Neurosurgery, McGovern Medical School at UTHealth.
Insights
This study compared pain management after selective dorsal rhizotomy (SDR) surgery for cerebral palsy. A new protocol using dexmedetomidine infusion reduced opioid use while maintaining similar pain control and therapy participation.
Area of Science:
- Neurosurgery
- Pediatric Orthopedics
- Pain Management
Background:
- Selective dorsal rhizotomy (SDR) is a key surgical intervention for spasticity in children with cerebral palsy.
- Optimizing postoperative pain management after SDR is crucial for patient recovery and rehabilitation.
- Current pain management protocols often rely heavily on opioids, necessitating research into opioid-sparing alternatives.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the clinical outcomes of SDR using a traditional opioid-based pain management protocol versus a novel protocol designed to reduce opioid dosage.
- To evaluate the efficacy of a modified pain management strategy involving dexmedetomidine infusion, gabapentin, acetaminophen, and NSAIDs.
Main Methods:
- A retrospective analysis of 30 pediatric patients undergoing SDR between 2015 and 2018.
- Patients were divided into two groups: traditional pain management (PCA group) and modified pain management (INF group).
- Data collected included demographic, surgical, postoperative pain scores, and medication administration records.
Main Results:
- The modified pain management (INF) group required significantly fewer opioid doses and lower overall opioid amounts compared to the traditional (PCA) group.
- Pain scores were comparable between the INF and PCA groups, despite reduced opioid consumption in the INF group.
- Hospital length of stay and participation in physical and occupational therapy were similar between the two groups.
Conclusions:
- A modified pain management protocol utilizing dexmedetomidine infusion, perioperative gabapentin, and scheduled non-opioid analgesics is effective in reducing opioid requirements after SDR.
- This opioid-sparing approach achieves comparable pain control to traditional methods, allowing for similar patient engagement in postoperative therapy.
- This pilot study supports the implementation of optimized pain management strategies to enhance recovery following SDR surgery in pediatric patients.
Objective:
Selective dorsal rhizotomy (SDR) is a surgical procedure used to treat spasticity in children with spastic cerebral palsy. Currently, there is a lack of work examining the efficacy of optimizing pain management protocols after single-level laminectomy for SDR. This pilot study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of SDR completed with a traditional pain management protocol versus one designed for opioid dosage reduction.
Methods:
The Texas Comprehensive Spasticity Center prospective database was queried for all patients who underwent SDR between 2015 and 2018. Demographic, surgical, and postoperative data for all patients who underwent SDR were collected from medical records. The study was designed as a retrospective study between the patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) and dexmedetomidine infusion (INF) groups with 80% power to detect a 50% difference at a significance level of 0.05. Patients in the INF group received perioperative gabapentin, intraoperative dexmedetomidine infusion, and scheduled acetaminophen and NSAIDs postoperatively.
Results:
Medication administration records, pain scores, and therapy notes were collected for 30 patients. Patients who underwent SDR between June 2015 and the end of December 2017 received traditional pain management (PCA group, n = 14). Patients who underwent SDR between January 2018 and the end of December 2018 received modified pain management (INF group, n = 16). No patients were lost to follow-up. Differences in age, weight, height, preoperative Gross Motor Function Classification System scores, operative duration, hospital length of stay, and sex distribution were not statistically different between the 2 groups (p > 0.05). Analysis of analgesic medication doses demonstrated that the INF group required fewer doses and lower amounts of opioids overall, and also fewer NSAIDs than the PCA group. When converted to the morphine milligram equivalent, the patients in the INF group used fewer doses and lower amounts of opioids overall than the PCA group. These differences were either statistically significant (p < 0.05) or trending toward significance (p < 0.10). Both groups participated in physical and occupational therapy similarly postoperatively (p > 0.05). Pain scores were comparable between the groups (p > 0.05) despite patients in the INF group requiring fewer opioids.
Conclusions:
Infusion with dexmedetomidine during SDR surgery combined with perioperative gabapentin and scheduled acetaminophen and NSAIDs postoperatively resulted in similar pain scores to traditional pain management with opioids. In addition, this pilot study demonstrated that patients who received the INF pain management protocol required reduced opioid dosages and were able to participate in therapy similarly to the control PCA group.
Related Concept Videos
Opioid Analgesics: Synthetic and Semisynthetic Opioids
Analgesia and Pain Management

