Piezosurgery versus conventional osteotomy in rhinoplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Piezosurgery, used in different otolaryngology procedures, was a breakthrough in surgery. We systematically reviewed the differences in outcomes after lateral nasal osteotomy with peizosurgery and conventional osteotome and quantified the differences through a meta-analysis.

Medline, Embase, and Cochrane library databases were selected to search for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) published before January 2019 that detailed differences between piezosurgery and conventional osteotomy. The key search terms included "rhinoplasty" and "piezosurgery." Only RCTs in English with patients >18 years who underwent lateral osteotomy by percutaneous or internal approaches were included. PRISMA guidelines were followed in data extraction and study inclusion. Two independent reviewers assessed the relevance of the studies. The point of estimate in the meta-analysis was the standardized mean difference and was pooled with the random-effects model. The measured outcomes were ecchymosis, edema, postoperative pain, and duration of surgery.

Five RCTs met our criteria and were analyzed in primary subsequent meta-analyses. Piezosurgery demonstrated significantly lower edema (SMD = -0.75; 95% CI, -1.26, -0.24) and ecchymosis scores (SMD = -0.85; 95% CI, -1.49, -0.20) on postoperative days (POD) 2 or 3 than conventional surgery. They were also significantly lower with piezosurgery than conventional surgery on POD 7 (SMD = -0.64; 95% CI, -1.21, -0.06; and SMD = -0.64; 95% CI, -1.14, -0.14, respectively). Two studies that estimated the degree of pain showed that after piezosurgery, patients experienced lesser pain than after conventional surgery. The mean difference was -0.73 (95% CI, -1.06, -0.39).

Piezosurgery causes less ecchymosis, edema, and pain than conventional osteotomy, without extending the duration of surgery. Laryngoscope, 130:1158-1165, 2020.