Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Serum Laboratory Studies, Stool Test, Breath Test01:30

Serum Laboratory Studies, Stool Test, Breath Test

691
Gastrointestinal (GI) diagnostic studies are pivotal in confirming, ruling out, diagnosing, or staging various diseases, including cancers. Following diagnosis, allocating time for discussions with the patient and providing informational resources is crucial. Diagnostic assessments of the GI tract often occur in outpatient settings like endoscopy suites or GI labs. Preparation for these tests may include dietary restrictions, fasting, liquid bowel preparations, laxatives, enemas, and the...
691

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Intraoperative dexamethasone and risk of postoperative infection after cesarean delivery: a retrospective cohort study.

International journal of obstetric anesthesia·2026
Same author

Inpatient postpartum recovery following episiotomy: secondary outcomes of a prospective observational study.

International journal of obstetric anesthesia·2026
Same author

Aspiration risk assessment for postpartum tubal ligation using gastric ultrasound: a single-center prospective observational trial.

International journal of obstetric anesthesia·2026
Same author

Professional society recommended interventions for enhanced recovery after cesarean delivery in the United States: a multidisciplinary Delphi study.

International journal of obstetric anesthesia·2025
Same author

Curvilinear versus phased array transducer: using the obstetric ultrasound for focused cardiac ultrasound in laboring patients - a randomized controlled assessment.

International journal of obstetric anesthesia·2025
Same author

Patient experiences of chronic postsurgical pain after caesarean delivery: findings from a prospective qualitative study.

International journal of obstetric anesthesia·2025
Same journal

ACG Clinical Guideline: Colonic Diverticulitis.

The American journal of gastroenterology·2026
Same journal

Inter and intra-observer agreement for the LST Classification in Large (>2cm) Colorectal Laterally Spreading Tumours.

The American journal of gastroenterology·2026
Same journal

The Safety and Effectiveness of Early Anti-Tumor-Necrosis-Factor Therapy for Penetrating Crohn's Disease Complications in Children.

The American journal of gastroenterology·2026
Same journal

Continuing Medical Education Questions: September 2024.

The American journal of gastroenterology·2026
Same journal

Continuing Medical Education Questions: September 2024.

The American journal of gastroenterology·2026
Same journal

Continuing Medical Education Questions: September 2024.

The American journal of gastroenterology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 3, 2026

Evaluation of Colorectal Cancer Risk and Prevalence by Stool DNA Integrity Detection
07:35

Evaluation of Colorectal Cancer Risk and Prevalence by Stool DNA Integrity Detection

Published on: June 8, 2020

7.3K

Multitarget Stool DNA Test Performance in an Average-Risk Colorectal Cancer Screening Population.

L J W Bosch1, V Melotte2, S Mongera3

  • 1Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

The American Journal of Gastroenterology
|November 26, 2019
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

The multitarget stool DNA (MT-sDNA) test shows higher sensitivity for detecting advanced precancerous lesions than the fecal immunochemical test (FIT) in average-risk screening. However, neither test significantly improved detection of high-risk advanced adenomas.

More Related Videos

Detection of a Circulating MicroRNA Custom Panel in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
08:12

Detection of a Circulating MicroRNA Custom Panel in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Published on: March 14, 2019

5.9K
Integration of Wet and Dry Bench Processes Optimizes Targeted Next-generation Sequencing of Low-quality and Low-quantity Tumor Biopsies
13:24

Integration of Wet and Dry Bench Processes Optimizes Targeted Next-generation Sequencing of Low-quality and Low-quantity Tumor Biopsies

Published on: April 11, 2016

12.2K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 3, 2026

Evaluation of Colorectal Cancer Risk and Prevalence by Stool DNA Integrity Detection
07:35

Evaluation of Colorectal Cancer Risk and Prevalence by Stool DNA Integrity Detection

Published on: June 8, 2020

7.3K
Detection of a Circulating MicroRNA Custom Panel in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
08:12

Detection of a Circulating MicroRNA Custom Panel in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

Published on: March 14, 2019

5.9K
Integration of Wet and Dry Bench Processes Optimizes Targeted Next-generation Sequencing of Low-quality and Low-quantity Tumor Biopsies
13:24

Integration of Wet and Dry Bench Processes Optimizes Targeted Next-generation Sequencing of Low-quality and Low-quantity Tumor Biopsies

Published on: April 11, 2016

12.2K

Area of Science:

  • Gastroenterology
  • Oncology
  • Molecular Diagnostics

Background:

  • Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening is crucial for early detection and prevention.
  • Multitarget stool DNA (MT-sDNA) tests offer a non-invasive approach to CRC screening.
  • Fecal immunochemical test (FIT) is a common, less sensitive screening method.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the performance of an MT-sDNA test compared to FIT in an average-risk CRC screening population.
  • To assess the sensitivity and specificity of MT-sDNA for detecting various colorectal lesions, including advanced adenomas.
  • To compare the detection rates of high-risk advanced adenomas between MT-sDNA and FIT.

Main Methods:

  • Prospective collection of 1,047 whole stool samples for MT-sDNA testing (KRAS mutations, NDRG4/BMP3 methylation, hemoglobin).
  • Comparison of MT-sDNA results with FIT (various hemoglobin thresholds) for detecting CRC, advanced precancerous lesions, and non-advanced adenomas.
  • Definition of high-risk advanced adenomas using DNA copy number events from low-pass whole genome sequencing.

Main Results:

  • MT-sDNA demonstrated significantly higher sensitivity (46%) than FIT (27%) for advanced precancerous lesions (P < 0.001).
  • Specificities were comparable: MT-sDNA (89%) and FIT (93%) for non-advanced/negative findings.
  • MT-sDNA positivity correlated with multiple and larger lesions, and those with tubulovillous architecture.

Conclusions:

  • MT-sDNA offers improved sensitivity for detecting advanced precancerous lesions in average-risk screening compared to FIT alone.
  • Neither MT-sDNA nor FIT significantly enhanced the detection of high-risk advanced adenomas.
  • MT-sDNA shows promise as a more sensitive non-invasive screening tool for colorectal neoplasia.