Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 3, 2026

Use of a Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Device/Left Atrium to Femoral Artery Bypass System for Cardiogenic Shock
Published on: August 16, 2021
Questionable utility of digoxin in left-ventricular assist device recipients: A multicenter, retrospective analysis
Mustafa M Ahmed1, Henri Roukoz2, Jaimin R Trivedi3
1Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States of America.
Insights
Digoxin use in patients with left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) did not improve survival or reduce hospital readmissions. Discontinuing digoxin after LVAD implantation did not negatively impact outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Medical Devices
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Clinical experience with left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) is growing.
- Limited data exists on medication use in LVAD recipients.
- The utility of digoxin in LVAD patients requires evaluation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess the effectiveness of digoxin in patients with continuous-flow LVAD.
- To determine the association between digoxin use and patient outcomes.
- To compare survival and readmission rates across different digoxin usage patterns.
Main Methods:
- A multicenter cohort study included 505 patients implanted with continuous-flow LVADs.
- Patients were categorized into four groups based on digoxin use: none, pre-implant only, continuous, and post-implant only.
- Survival and all-cause readmission rates were compared between the groups.
Main Results:
- No significant differences in 1-year or 3-year survival rates were observed between the digoxin groups.
- All-cause readmission rates per 100 days did not differ significantly across the groups.
- Digoxin use, regardless of timing, showed no association with improved mortality or hospitalization.
Conclusions:
- Digoxin use is not associated with improved mortality or hospitalization in continuous-flow LVAD patients.
- Discontinuation of digoxin post-LVAD implantation does not worsen survival or hospitalization rates.
- Further research may be needed to clarify the role of digoxin in LVAD management.
Background:
While clinical experience with left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) continues to grow and evolve, little is known regarding the ongoing use of certain medications in this population. We sought to evaluate the utility of digoxin in LVAD recipients and its association with outcomes.
Methods:
A total of 505 patients who underwent continuous-flow LVAD implantation at 5 centers from 2007-2015 were included. Patients were divided into 4 groups: not on digoxin at any time (ND; n = 257), received digoxin pre implant (PreD; n = 144), received digoxin pre and post implant (ContD; n = 55), and received digoxin only post implant (PostD; n = 49). Survival and all-cause readmission were compared between the 4 groups.
Results:
There was no difference in survival at 1 year nor at 3 years between groups (ND = 88%, 66%, respectively; PreD = 85%, 66%; ContD = 86%, 57%; PostD = 90%, 51%; p = 0.7). Readmission per 100 days also was not different between groups (ND = 0.5, PreD = 0.6, ContD = 0.5, PostD = 0.7; p = 0.1).
Conclusions:
In this large, multicenter cohort, use of digoxin was not associated with any significant benefit in regard to mortality or hospitalization in patients supported with a continuous-flow LVAD. Importantly, its discontinuation post implant did not worsen all-cause hospitalization or survival.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Heart Failure Drugs: Inotropic Agents
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Heart Failure V: Medical Management
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Heart Failure IV: Classification and Diagnostic Evaluation

