It's Time to Replace the Term "Heavy Metals" with "Potentially Toxic Elements" When Reporting Environmental Research

Area of Science:

• Environmental Science
• Chemistry
• Toxicology

Background:

• The term "heavy metal" has been widely used for decades across natural and environmental sciences.
• Its usage persists despite lacking a precise scientific definition, leading to ambiguity.
• The term is particularly prevalent in studies concerning pollution impacts and environmental contamination.

Discussion:

• This paper argues for the explicit endorsement and adoption of the term "Potentially Toxic Element(s)" (PTEs).
• PTEs offers a more scientifically accurate and descriptive classification for elements with toxicological relevance.
• The study identifies specific chemical elements that should be considered under the PTEs classification.

Key Insights:

• "Heavy metal" is an imprecise and controversial term in scientific literature.
• "Potentially Toxic Element(s)" (PTEs) is a more accurate and recommended term.
• Clearer terminology is crucial for effective communication in environmental pollution studies.

Outlook:

• Wider adoption of the term PTEs will enhance clarity in scientific research and environmental policy.
• Further research should focus on refining the criteria for classifying elements as PTEs.
• Standardizing terminology will improve the consistency and impact of studies on toxic elements.