Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 3, 2026

Integrating Computerized Linguistic and Social Network Analyses to Capture Addiction Recovery Capital in an Online Community
Published on: May 31, 2019
The Study of Network Community Capacity to be a Subject: Digital Discursive Footprints
Anatoly N Voronin1, Taisiya A Grebenschikova1, Tina A Kubrak1
1Laboratory of Speech Psychology and Psycholinguistics, Institute of Psychology, Russian Academy of Sciences; 13, Yaroslavskaya, Moscow 129366, Russia.
Abstract:
The article is devoted to the assessment of the network community as a collective subject, as a group of interconnected and interdependent persons performing joint activities. According to the main research hypothesis, various forms of group subjectness, which determine its readiness for joint activities, are manifested in the discourse of the network community. Discourse constitutes a network community, mediates the interaction of its participants, represents ideas about the world, values, relationships, attitudes, sets patterns of behavior. A procedure is proposed for identifying discernible traces of the subjectness of a network community at various levels (lexical, semantic, content-analytical scales, etc.). The subjective structure of the network community is described based on experts' implicit representations. The revealed components of the subjectness of network communities are compared with the characteristics of the subjectness of offline social groups. It is shown that the structure of the subjectness of network communities for some components is similar to the structure of the characteristics of the subjectness of offline social groups: the discourse of the network community represents a discussion of joint activities, group norms, and values, problems of civic identity. The specificity of network communities' subjectness is revealed, which is manifested in the positive support of communication within the community, the identification and support of distinction between "us" and "them". Two models of the relationship between discursive features and the construct "subjectness" are compared: additive-cumulative and additive. The equivalence of models is established based on the discriminativeness and the level of consistency with expert evaluation by external criteria.
More Related Videos
08:36Dynamic Inter-subject Functional Connectivity Reveals Moment-to-Moment Brain Network Configurations Driven by Continuous or Communication Paradigms
Published on: March 21, 2019
10:28Dynamic Digital Biomarkers of Motor and Cognitive Function in Parkinson's Disease
Published on: July 24, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Social Foundations of Self IV: Self in Digital Communication
Relationship Formation
Impact of Social Context on Individuals
Social Exchange Theory
Social Exchange Theory
Biofilms