Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 3, 2026

Microfluidic Devices for Characterizing Pore-scale Event Processes in Porous Media for Oil Recovery Applications
Published on: January 16, 2018
Dispersion modeling in pore networks: A comparison of common pore-scale models and alternative approaches
Mohammad Amin Sadeghi1, Mehrez Agnaou2, Jake Barralet3
1Department of Chemical Engineering, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Abstract:
Mass transfer in porous media resulting from dispersion occurs in a wide variety of applications such as water treatment, flow batteries, flow in aquifers, enhanced oil recovery, and packed-bed reactors. The underlying mechanisms of dispersion are the molecular diffusion superimposed on the advective transport induced by the fluid flow. Modeling dispersion in pore networks can be performed at a much lower computational cost compared to that in direct numerical simulations (DNS) such as finite element or the lattice Boltzmann methods, so it can be regarded as a suitable alternative provided its accuracy is sufficient. The most common approach to model dispersion in network models is based on the first-order upwind scheme, despite its known limitations in terms of accuracy for certain flow and transport regimes. In this study, three alternative pore-scale models for dispersion, which are more accurate than the existing ones, were derived and tested in pore network simulations. These models were adopted from the CFD literature and are based on a spatial discretization of the advection-diffusion equation using the hybrid and power-law finite difference schemes and the exact solution of the one-dimensional advection-diffusion equation. Finally, considering dispersion problems over arbitrary porous structures, consisting of stick-and-ball geometries, and different flow and mass transfer arrangements, the developed models were validated. Validation was carried-out through comparisons between results obtained with DNS, using a finite element solver, and those from pore network simulations. It is shown that under a wide range of dispersion regimes (up to the onset of the dispersion power-law regime), the relative error (with respect to DNS results) introduced by the power-law and exact solution-based models is consistently below 1%, whereas the use of the upwind scheme leads to >10% of relative error, depending on the dispersion regime. All the dispersion models developed in this study were implemented as part of the open-source network modeling package, OpenPNM.
More Related Videos
10:18Dynamic Pore-scale Reservoir-condition Imaging of Reaction in Carbonates Using Synchrotron Fast Tomography
Published on: February 21, 2017
12:32Combining Fluidic Devices with Microscopy and Flow Cytometry to Study Microbial Transport in Porous Media Across Spatial Scales
Published on: November 25, 2020
Related Concept Videos
Pore Size Distribution
Adequate...
Typical Model Studies
Model Approaches for Pharmacokinetic Data: Distributed Parameter Models
The distributed parameter models are specifically designed to account for variations and differences in some drug classes. This model is particularly useful for assessing regional concentrations of anticancer or...
Mechanistic Models: Compartment Models in Individual and Population Analysis
Physiological Pharmacokinetic Models: Blood Flow-Limited Versus Diffusion-Limited Models
Theories of Dissolution: The Danckwerts' Model and Interfacial Barrier Model