Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

356
Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
356
Clinical Trials01:16

Clinical Trials

10.1K
Clinical trials are prospective experimental studies conducted on humans to determine the safety and efficacy of treatments, drugs, diet methods, and medical devices. Using statistics in clinical trials enables researchers to derive reasonable and accurate conclusions from the collected data, allowing them to make wise decisions in uncertain situations. In medical research, statistical methods are crucial for preventing errors and bias.
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
10.1K
Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

8.8K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
8.8K
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs01:15

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs

134
Body:Bioequivalence experimental study designs play a pivotal role in testing the effectiveness of various treatments. Key among these are the repeated measures, cross-over, carry-over, and Latin square designs. In the repeated measures design, each subject receives all treatments, allowing for temporal comparisons. This type of design is useful in reducing variability but requires careful planning to avoid bias.The cross-over design, an economical method, involves sequential administration of...
134
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

325
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
325
Cochran's Q Test01:17

Cochran's Q Test

887
Cochran's Q Test is a nonparametric statistical test used to determine if there are potential differences in the outcomes of three or more related groups on a binary (yes/no) or dichotomous outcome. It is essentially an extension of the McNemar Test, which is limited to two related samples - Cochran's Q test can handle three or more related samples, making it more versatile in scenarios where subjects are measured under multiple conditions. The test statistic follows a Chi-Square...
887

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Sensor-based measures of knee brace adherence have low agreement with self-report methods: a multi-measure study among knee osteoarthritis patients.

Osteoarthritis and cartilage·2026
Same author

The psychosocial impacts of having eating and drinking difficulties after stroke: a qualitative evidence synthesis.

Disability and rehabilitation·2026
Same author

Implementation of the PARTNERS model of care within two UK community mental health transformation systems: a qualitative realist evaluation.

BMC health services research·2026
Same author

Developing a rehabilitation intervention for eating and drinking difficulties following stroke through co-design stakeholder workshops.

BMC health services research·2026
Same author

A mixed methods analysis of health literacy among adults with brachial plexus birth injury.

Journal of pediatric rehabilitation medicine·2026
Same author

Screening for social determinants of health in primary care: protocol for a feasibility study.

BJGP open·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 3, 2026

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
08:36

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

1.1K

Integrating quantitative and qualitative data and findings when undertaking randomised controlled trials.

David A Richards1, Patricia Bazeley2, Gunilla Borglin3,4

  • 1Institute of Health Sciences, College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, Devon, UK D.A.Richards@exeter.ac.uk.

BMJ Open
|November 28, 2019
PubMed
Summary

Integrating qualitative research with randomized controlled trials (RCTs) enhances data analysis and credibility. This approach offers deeper insights into complex interventions, improving trial outcomes and patient-centered care.

Keywords:
integrationqualitativequantitativeresearch methodstrials

More Related Videos

Enactive Phenomenological Approach to the Trier Social Stress Test: A Mixed Methods Point of View
05:26

Enactive Phenomenological Approach to the Trier Social Stress Test: A Mixed Methods Point of View

Published on: January 7, 2019

7.1K
A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
14:43

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

Published on: January 12, 2018

12.5K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 3, 2026

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
08:36

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

1.1K
Enactive Phenomenological Approach to the Trier Social Stress Test: A Mixed Methods Point of View
05:26

Enactive Phenomenological Approach to the Trier Social Stress Test: A Mixed Methods Point of View

Published on: January 7, 2019

7.1K
A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
14:43

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

Published on: January 12, 2018

12.5K

Area of Science:

  • Clinical Trials Methodology
  • Mixed Methods Research
  • Health Services Research

Background:

  • Qualitative research is often conducted alongside randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for complex interventions.
  • Current practice typically involves separate analysis of quantitative and qualitative data, limiting integration and insight generation.
  • There is a missed opportunity to enhance rigor, credibility, and understanding of interventions by not integrating these data sources.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify strengths and weaknesses in integrating quantitative and qualitative methods in clinical trials.
  • To establish next steps for providing guidance on mixed methods integration in RCTs.
  • To form a collaborative network for methodological advancement in mixed methods research.

Main Methods:

  • Convened a 2-day expert meeting funded by the UK Medical Research Council Hubs for Trials Methodology Research.
  • Summarized existing integration techniques for quantitative and qualitative data.
  • Presented three specific examples of integration value within RCTs.

Main Results:

  • Highlighted the potential value of integrating quantitative and qualitative findings from RCTs.
  • Demonstrated how integration can illuminate outcome variations and intervention mechanisms.
  • Showcased how integration aids in tailoring therapies to patient preferences.

Conclusions:

  • Integrating mixed methods in RCTs can yield significant insights into intervention effectiveness and application.
  • There is a need for greater awareness and practical guidance on mixed methods integration techniques.
  • Future development of guidance for researchers and funders is essential for effective implementation.