Effect of pH Cycling Followed by Simulated Toothbrushing on the Surface Roughness and Bacterial Adhesion of Bulk-fill...

The aim was to evaluate, in vitro, quantitatively and qualitatively, the effect of pH cycling and simulated toothbrushing on surface roughness (Ra) and bacterial adhesion (Cn) of bulk-fill composite resins. Thirty specimens of each composite resin, 5 mm wide and 4 mm high, were obtained: group 1 (control): Filtek Z250 (Z250); group 2: Filtek Bulk-Fill (FTK); group 3: Tetric N-Ceram Bulk-Fill (TTC); and group 4: Aura Bulk-Fill (AUR). After 24 hours, the specimens were polished and then alternated with demineralization/remineralization solutions for 15 cycles of 24 hours each at 37°C. Then the specimens were submitted to simulated toothbrushing. The Ra and Cn measurements were quantitatively analyzed in three stages: after polishing (Ra0 and Cn0), after pH cycling (Ra1 and Cn1), and after simulated toothbrushing (Ra2 and Cn2). The Ra values were submitted to two-way analysis of variance, followed by the Tukey test (α=0.05). The Kruskal-Wallis test, followed by multiple comparisons, was applied for Cn analysis. Surface topography and bacterial adhesion were observed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Z250, FTK, and TTC showed no significant change in Ra regardless of the treatment performed; AUR obtained increased Ra at Ra2 (p<0.05). FTK differed from the others at Cn0 and Cn1 (p<0.05). At Cn2, there was no difference among the composite resins. SEM images showed the exposure of fillers and microcavities at Ra1 and Ra2. There was greater bacterial adhesion at Cn1 for Z250 and FTK. It was concluded that the pH cycling caused surface degradation of all composite resins, which was potentiated by simulated toothbrushing. However, only AUR presented an increased Ra. Bacterial adhesion occurred on all composite resins after pH cycling; however, after simulated toothbrushing, adhesion of dispersed bacteria was similar for all the composite resin groups.