Related Experiment Videos
Unknown uterine scar and trial of labor
K M Pruett1, B Kirshon, D B Cotton
1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030.
Abstract:
A review of 393 patients undergoing trial of labor after one or more previous cesarean sections was performed. Three hundred patients had an unknown uterine scar, 88 patients had a documented low cervical transverse incision, and five patients had a prior low vertical incision. The rate of vaginal delivery and maternal and fetal morbidity was no different in those patients with an unknown prior uterine incision compared with those having a known prior low cervical transverse incision. In 66 of the patients with a documented low cervical transverse incision, the original operative record was reviewed in regard to single-layer closure of the uterine incision versus double-layer closure or imbricating technique. No patient with a double-layer uterine closure had a subsequent dehiscence, whereas three patients with a prior single-layer closure exhibited scar separation. These data suggest that neither an unknown scar nor a single-layer uterine closure places the mother or fetus at greater risk.