Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 6, 2026

Closed-loop Neuro-robotic Experiments to Test Computational Properties of Neuronal Networks
Published on: March 2, 2015
Codes, functions, and causes: A critique of Brette's conceptual analysis of coding
1Jerome L. Greene Science Center, Columbia University, New York, NY10027; DeepMind, LondonN1C 4AG, United Kingdom. dbarack@gmail.comdrewjaegle@google.comwww.deepmind.com.
Abstract:
Brette argues that coding as a concept is inappropriate for explanations of neurocognitive phenomena. Here, we argue that Brette's conceptual analysis mischaracterizes the structure of causal claims in coding and other forms of analysis-by-decomposition. We argue that analyses of this form are permissible and conceptually coherent and offer essential tools for building and developing models of neurocognitive systems like the brain.
Related Concept Videos
Epistasis Analysis
Functionalism
James envisioned psychology's role as...
Cognitivism
Previously dominated by behaviorism, which prioritized observable behaviors and largely ignored mental processes, psychology transformed in the 1950s. Cognitive psychologists argue that understanding how we think and process information is...
Criticisms of the Evolutionary Perspective
Evolutionary psychology provides one explanation for these findings, suggesting...
Theory of Attribution I: Correspondent Inference Theory
Theory of Attribution II: Kelley's Covariation Theory

