Exercise tolerance during flat over-ground intermittent running: modelling the expenditure and reconstitution...

We compared a new locomotor-specific model to track the expenditure and reconstitution of work done above critical power (W´) and balance of W´ (W´_BAL) by modelling flat over-ground power during exhaustive intermittent running.

Nine male participants completed a ramp test, 3-min all-out test and the 30-15 intermittent fitness test (30-15 IFT), and performed a severe-intensity constant work-rate trial (S_CWR) at the maximum oxygen uptake velocity (vV̇O_2max). Four intermittent trials followed: 60-s at vV̇O_2max + 50% Δ₁ (Δ₁ = vV̇O_2max - critical velocity [V_Crit]) interspersed by 30-s in light (S_L; 40% vV̇O_2max), moderate (S_M; 90% gas-exchange threshold velocity [V_GET]), heavy (S_H; V_GET + 50% Δ₂ [Δ₂ = V_Crit - V_GET]), or severe (S_S; vV̇O_2max - 50% Δ₁) domains. Data from Global Positioning Systems were derived to model over-ground power. The difference between critical and recovery power (D_CP), time constant for reconstitution of W´ ([Formula: see text]), time to limit of tolerance (T_LIM), and W´_BAL from the integral (W´_BALint), differential (W´_BALdiff), and locomotor-specific (OG-W´_BAL) methods were compared.

The relationship between [Formula: see text] and D_CP was exponential (r² = 0.52). The [Formula: see text] for S_L, S_M, and S_H trials were 119 ± 32-s, 190 ± 45-s, and 336 ± 77-s, respectively. Actual T_LIM in the 30-15 IFT (968 ± 117-s) compared closely to T_LIM predicted by OG-W´_BAL (929 ± 94-s, P > 0.100) and W´_BALdiff (938 ± 84-s, P > 0.100) but not to W´_BALint (848 ± 91-s, P = 0.001).

The OG-W´_BAL accurately tracked W´ kinetics during intermittent running to exhaustion on flat surfaces.