Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 3, 2026

Selecting Multiple Biomarker Subsets with Similarly Effective Binary Classification Performances
Published on: October 11, 2018
A tutorial on dynamic risk prediction of a binary outcome based on a longitudinal biomarker
Rana Dandis1, Steven Teerenstra1, Leon Massuger2
1Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
This study presents four methods for dynamic risk prediction of gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN) using repeated human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) measurements. Joint models showed superior performance in simulations with high biomarker variability.
Area of Science:
- Biostatistics
- Clinical Prediction Modeling
- Oncology
Background:
- Dynamic risk predictions are crucial for timely identification of high-risk patients.
- Predicting future binary outcomes with repeatedly measured biomarkers remains challenging.
- Existing methods for updating predictions with longitudinal biomarker data require further investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To provide an overview of four distinct approaches for dynamic risk prediction of a future binary outcome using longitudinal biomarker data.
- To compare the performance of likelihood-based and Bayesian methods, including two-stage and joint models.
- To illustrate the application of these models for predicting post-molar gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN) using human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) measurements.
Main Methods:
- Four prediction approaches were evaluated: likelihood-based two-stage method (2SMLE), likelihood-based joint model (JMMLE), Bayesian two-stage method (2SB), and Bayesian joint model (JMB).
- Models were applied to weekly updated predictions of GTN using age and repeated hCG measurements.
- Model performance was assessed using discrimination and calibration measures, with internal validation via bootstrapping.
Main Results:
- All four approaches demonstrated comparable predictive and discriminative performance for GTN prediction in the applied dataset.
- A simulation study indicated that joint models outperformed two-stage methods when biomarker variability (within- and between-patient) increased.
- The study provides practical insights into obtaining and updating dynamic predictions for binary outcomes.
Conclusions:
- The evaluated methods offer viable strategies for dynamic risk prediction using longitudinal biomarker data.
- Joint models are recommended over two-stage methods in scenarios with substantial biomarker variability.
- The findings support the use of dynamic predictions for improved patient management in conditions like GTN.
Related Concept Videos
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Introduction To Survival Analysis
The primary goal of survival analysis is to estimate survival time—the time...
Survival Tree
Building a Survival Tree
Constructing a...
Prediction Intervals
However, the point estimate is most likely not the exact value of the population parameter, but close to it. After calculating point estimates, we construct interval estimates, called confidence intervals or prediction intervals. This prediction interval comprises a range of values unlike the point estimate and is a better predictor of the observed sample value, y.
Relative Risk
Kaplan-Meier Approach

