Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 3, 2026

Digital Home-Monitoring of Patients after Kidney Transplantation: The MACCS Platform
Published on: April 12, 2021
Scales for assessing medication adherence in patients with hypertension
Anastasia Chatziefstratiou1, Konstantinos Giakoumidakis2, Nikolaos V Fotos3
1General Hospital of Athens, Paidon Agia Sofia, Athens, Greece.
Insights
This study found that the Hill-Bone, A-14, and Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS) are reliable tools for assessing medication adherence in Greek hypertensive patients. Careful translation is crucial for accurate results.
Area of Science:
- Pharmacology
- Clinical Research
- Psychometrics
Background:
- Assessing medication adherence is crucial but challenging in scientific research.
- Validated tools are needed to accurately measure adherence in diverse patient populations.
- The reliability of existing adherence scales in the Greek language requires investigation.
Purpose of the Study:
- Translate and validate the Hill-Bone and A-14 medication adherence scales into Greek.
- Evaluate the reliability and internal consistency of these translated scales in hypertensive patients.
- Compare the responses obtained from the Hill-Bone, A-14, and Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS) in Greek patients.
Main Methods:
- Cross-sectional study conducted in Athens, Greece, from February to March 2016.
- Participants included 34 hypertensive and 34 non-hypertensive patients.
- Reliability was assessed using Cronbach's alpha coefficient for each scale.
Main Results:
- In hypertensive patients, Cronbach's alpha was 0.76 (Hill-Bone), 0.64 (MMAS), and 0.91 (A-14).
- In non-hypertensive patients, Cronbach's alpha was 0.81 (MMAS) and 0.78 (A-14).
- Statistically significant differences were observed in mean scale scores, with strong correlations found only between similarly worded items.
Conclusions:
- The translated Hill-Bone, A-14, and MMAS scales demonstrate appropriate reliability for assessing medication adherence in Greek hypertensive patients.
- Ensuring careful and culturally sensitive translation of adherence scales is essential for accurate interpretation of results.
- The A-14 scale exhibited the highest internal consistency among hypertensive patients in this study.
Background:
the choice of the appropriate tool for assessing level of medication adherence is a significant barrier in scientific research.
Aims:
to translate into Greek and test the reliability of the Hill-Bone and A-14 scales among patients with hypertension. Also, to compare patients' responses in the Hill-Bone scale, A-14 scale and Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS).
Methods:
data collection occurred between February 2016 and March 2016 at a general hospital in Athens, Greece. The sample consisted of hypertensive patients (n=34) and non-hypertensive patients (n=34).
Findings:
the coefficient alpha in hypertensive patients was 0.76 for Hill-Bone, 0.64 for MMAS and 0.91 for the A-14 scale. In non-hypertensive patients, the Cronbach's alpha for MMAS was 0.81 and 0.78 for A-14. A statistically significant difference was found among the mean scores of the scales, whereas strong correlation was found only between two pairs of questions with similar meaning.
Conclusion:
all tools are appropriate to assess the level of medication adherence in Greek hypertensive patients. However, careful translation of the scales is essential since items with the same meaning could be understudied in a different way.
Related Concept Videos
Hypertension V: Nursing Management
Hypertension IV: Drug Therapy and Lifestyle Modifications
Assessment of blood pressure in brachial artery(two-step method)
Assessment of blood pressure in brachial artery(one-step method)
Prepare for the Procedure:
Hypertension III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring
Several factors...
